Credit – USNC
As with many remote sensing applications, that beam would then at least partially reflect back towards a sensor mounted on the rover and can be analyzed to detect the material it was reflecting off of. But, X-rays have an additional feature that anyone who has seen a medical one would be familiar with – they can see what’s underneath an object’s surface. Gamma rays can do so as well.
That added advantage makes having a controllable x-ray/gamma-ray remote sensing platform that also serves as the power source of the rover carrying is an exciting innovation and precisely the kind of research that NIAC usually goes for. The outcome of this preliminary research would be a mission design to one of two places on the Moon.
First would be Shackleton Crater, which has long been thought to hold large amounts of water. Accessing that water would be vital to supporting any long-term human effort to live on the Moon. A remote sensing platform that could scan the crater’s surroundings for the most significant deposits on and under the surface would be invaluable for directing astronauts where to look.Another location would be the famous Sea of Tranquility , where Apollo 11 first touched down on the Moon.
NIAC Phase I grants are a first step down a long road towards being used on a space mission. But USNC, which is based in Seattle and headed by a former Chief Scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and its EmberCore technology are starting down that road with this concept, and it’s not the first one they’re doing. They were also funded by the US Military’s Defense Innovation Unit to research a nuclear propulsion engine for spacecraft, also based on the EmberCore engine.
AndyTomaswick Correction : At 9:08, your video mentions 800X which is wrong. It is only 200X, as mentioned on ShadowCam website YouTube - ShadowCam -
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Source: ClevelandScene - 🏆 383. / 55 Read more »
Source: PoPville - 🏆 435. / 53 Read more »