that House Democrats can take the Trump administration to court when current and former officials refuse to comply with subpoenas, rejecting the Justice Department's argument that Congress could not ever sue.
"Indeed, the ordinary and effective functioning of the Legislative Branch critically depends on the legislative prerogative to obtain information, and constitutional structure and historical practice support judicial enforcement of congressional subpoenas when necessary," Rogers wrote. The DC Circuit heard arguments in the case in April, along with a separate case that House Democrats had brought against the administration over Trump's plan to divert money allocated for military spending to pay for border wall construction. In that case, the administration had also argued that Congress lacked standing to sue. The DC Circuit sent that case back down to the district court judge to reconsider in light of the decision in the McGahn case.
US District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson ruled in November that the committee did have standing to sue, and she also dove into the merits of the fight and rejected the administration's absolute immunity argument. The Justice Department appealed, and the three-judge panel sided with the Trump administration on the standing issue in February. Rogers, who wrote the main opinion on Friday, was part of the original panel and dissented at the time.
Russia Russia Russia
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Appeals Court Revives House Democrats’ Lawsuit Seeking Testimony of Former Trump White House CounselA federal appeals court on Friday revived a bid by House Democrats to require former White House counsel Don McGahn to testify in an investigation of President Trump. Just stop already! So sick and tired of wasting tax payer money on witch hunts! After he testifies lock him up. This seems prudent with everything that is going on in 2020. Doesn't smell political at all. 🤔
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Appeals court rules for U.S. House over subpoena for ex-White House lawyerA U.S. appeals court on Friday dealt the administration of President Donald Trump a major legal setback, ruling against its bid to block a Democratic-led congressional panel&39;s subpoena for testimony from former White House Counsel Donald McGahn. The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Ruling backs refunds for accessing federal court records onlineThe federal government could be on the hook for millions of dollars in refunds to users of online court records after an appeals court found that users of the PACER system were unlawfully overcharged
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Upholds Dismissal Of Cliven Bundy CaseA federal appeals court rejected an attempt by the Justice Department to get a retrial in the case against rancher Cliven Bundy, who led an armed standoff over cattle grazing near his ranch in 2014. This guy is a deadbeat who didn't want to pay grazing fees. Hopefully all of the people who did and had to compete against him will find his stand as repugnant as it is. Too bad. He was the real terrorist.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
House can subpoena Don McGahn to testify, appeals court rulesThe House of Representatives can sue to force former White House counsel Don McGahn to testify, a federal appeals court ruled Friday, but McGahn can continue to challenge the House's subpoena and likely will not have to appear anytime soon. Should never had go too court. This exactly another reason. Trump has too go. VOTE But what will happen before the election is that ObamaGate & crooked Biden will be exposed. Comey is going down, Yates and others are protecting themselves now. And CNN is still going to be the most inept propaganda machine on tv. How can you be so wrong about everything? Keep playing political games ...
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »
Supreme Court lifts lower court order that would have required more Covid-related safety measures in California jailA divided Supreme Court has lifted a lower court order that required increased Covid-related safety measures in an Orange County, California, jail while the appeals process plays out Wiz do not have the right coach. He reminds me of Eddie Jordan. Keeps starters in too long loses late in games because if it. Wall and Beal were exhausted half way thru the late 3rd and 4th qtrs. SupremeCourt judges should be JAILED Maybe SCOTUS is taking many emergency reviews for stays, etc to clear cases without in person/video arguments. The decision was 5-4. Perhaps the Chief and Justices are not certain of the physical health & participation of Justice Ginsberg and is preparing for a nomination?
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »