4 takeaways from the Supreme Court’s Trump immunity decision

A police officer stands near the security gate at the Supreme Court of the United States on Monday in Washington, D.C. for actions taken as president, in a decision that could reverberate not just in Trump’s criminal cases but for future presidents.

The justices didn’t delve deeply into extensive details of what is and isn’t fair game in Trump’s trials. They instead mostly set broad parameters and sent the case back to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan to consider how those parameters affect the case.The court ruled that Trump is absolutely immune from prosecution for any conduct “involving discussions with Justice Department officials” — a significant segment of his federal indictment.

The other crucial point is this: The court ruled that not only can’t Trump be prosecuted for certain conduct, but conduct for which he is immune. So his interactions with Justice Department officials, for instance, can’t be used to establish a criminal conspiracy to overturn the election.“The Constitution does not require blinding juries to the circumstances surrounding conduct for which Presidents can be held liable,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in a concurrence.

The court’s liberal wing raised a giant red flag on that front, casting the decision as empowering future presidents to take drastic actions. Sotomayor added: “The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.”“Thus, even a hypothetical President who admits to having ordered the assassinations of his political rivals or critics … or one who indisputably instigates an unsuccessful coup … has a fair shot at getting immunity under the majority’s new Presidential accountability model,” Jackson wrote.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court returns Trump immunity case to lower courtsRuling says former presidents do not have immunity for unofficial acts. Lower courts will apply the standard to charges that Trump plotted to overturn his...
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »

Trump VP Contender Byron Donalds Says Supreme Court Should Intervene on Trump’s Guilty ConvictionHe unsurprisingly believes the hush money case was all about election “interference.”
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court knocks down Wall Street regulator’s in-house courtsThe justices backed a challenge to the constitutionality of the SEC’s internal tribunals — a resounding win for conservatives.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court courts sides with Starbucks in blow to union activistsExperts say the decision could make it harder for the National Labor Relations Board to obtain relief when companies are accused of violating labor law.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Can State Supreme Courts Preserve—or Expand—Rights?With a lopsided conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, Eyal Press writes, progressive activists are seeking legal opportunities in state constitutions.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court punts social media moderation cases back to lower courtsThe Supreme Court on Monday wiped existing rulings, kicked social media moderation cases back to lower courts
Source: NBCNewYork - 🏆 270. / 63 Read more »