through-and-through, but how dare Nissan try to reduce, reuse and recycle when engineering its “all-new” Z. Once again,The bottom line with sports cars like these two should always be how they comport themselves on the road, not the circumstances around how they were born. We can all have a laugh at the Supra’s BMW iDrive infotainment system and the Z’s 2010-spec climate controls, but those factors wouldn’t determine the winner here.
The Z starts to feel a little uncomfortable as soon as you settle into its well-bolstered bucket. Instead of sittingof it. This sensation follows you around in all of its movements. It takes considerable seat time before we really start to get attuned to the way the Z’s body moves through corners whereas the Supra instantly feels natural. There’s a sense of imposter syndrome from the chassis that starts on initial turn in and continues through corner exit and consecutive corner transitions.
One place you might not have expected a win from the Z is its tech package, but the Supra’s woefully dated iDrive 6 infotainment system leaves Toyota with a big impediment here. While Z owners get to enjoy both wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, Supra buyers are limited to only wireless Apple CarPlay in an infotainment system that is now several whole versions out of date . Nissan was even able to sort out how to combine adaptive cruise control with a manual transmission.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CARandDRIVER - 🏆 576. / 51 Read more »
Source: CARandDRIVER - 🏆 576. / 51 Read more »
Source: auto123 - 🏆 566. / 51 Read more »
Source: auto123 - 🏆 566. / 51 Read more »
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: njdotcom - 🏆 282. / 63 Read more »