Reed Hastings, the billionaire cofounder of Netflix, and his spouse, Patty Quillin, have become two of California’s biggest donors to state propositions. Their political giving to the Golden State’s propositions have nearly doubled when compared to the 2016 election cycle. What’s more: while all the political donations were given by Hastings four years ago, for this election, nearly all of the gifts have been made under Quillin’s name.
In total, Hastings and Quillin have given $4.5 million to various fundraising committees for new California propositions up for a vote this November. In 2016, they gave $2.5 million. Of the 12 statewide propositions up for a vote, the couple has given towards five of them. The couple has also given $399,450 in 2019 and 2020 to political candidates up for election in the California State Legislature. ahead of the 2020 election. At a national level, they have given at least $1.
A spokesperson for the couple declined to comment on the political donations. Hastings, who cofounded Netflix in 1997 and is chairman and co-CEO, is currently worth $5 billion,Under Quillin’s name, the couple gave $2 million to oppose Proposition 20, which if approved would increase penalties for some property crimes — like shoplifting items more than $250 in value or car theft — and for repeated parole violations, thus making it more difficult for convicted felons to qualify for early parole.
Other state committees they’ve given to this year include $250,000 each to support Proposition 17, which would allow parolees to vote, and Proposition 18, which would allow 17 year olds to vote in state primaries and special elections if they turn 18 before the general election. The only political gift to a statewide proposition that Hastings made under his name this year is a $200,000 donation to support Proposition 13, which was up for a vote during the primary elections in March. If it passed, it would have authorized the state to issue $15 billion worth of bonds to modernize and build out public schools, community colleges and universities. But it failed to garner enough votes to pass.
AngelAuYeung Of course they did. Who do you think they would like to see win. The wokest couple on earth.
AngelAuYeung More good news please(((
AngelAuYeung This is the problem with ballot measures. They are often populist in nature with little thought of good governance. Then the rich pour money into them with outsized influence-- in this case for good, but other cases very bad. Reactionary ballot measures are undemocratic!
AngelAuYeung
AngelAuYeung Vote no on everything this person tells you to vote on.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »