Why the Online Safety Bill is proving so controversial

  • 📰 SkyNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 75 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 33%
  • Publisher: 67%

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines

We look at the rocky path the legislation to protect people online has taken - and where it will go next.

The crux of the plan was to make Ofcom the new regulator of internet firms, with the power to fine them up to 10% of their global turnover if they failed to take down harmful content.

For technology companies, the fear was it would not be clear what they were expected to censor, and they demanded more clarity.- they were concerned the rule overreached and firms would err on the side of caution to avoid the hefty fines threatened by the government, leading to a direct threat to free speech.

Yet there was still no definition of the so-called legal harms - just the promise it would be set out in further legislation down the track.Instead of progressing though, the law was again hit by delays, this time due to the trials and tribulations within the Conservative Party. The future of the law was then up in the air, with a new leader set to take the keys to Downing Street.Boris Johnson handed the baton on to Liz truss, who did promise to keep the bill with "tweaks".

Ms Dorries also warned the frontbench should be prepared for"one mother of a massive fight" with female Tory MPs if the bill was watered down, attacking her successor Michelle Donelan in the House magazine, saying she had"been in the job five minutes and does not understand enough about it".Fast forward a month and it brings us to the government's new announcement - the bill is back and with some significant changes.

But instead of their legal but harmful duties, they will have to provide adults with tools to hide certain content they do not wish to see - such as posts related to eating disorders, misogyny and other forms of abuse.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

To ‘Protect people online’, but also to censor and dramatically limit free speech and freedom of press. This legislation is not all it seems.

It's controversial because its a huge pile of wank. The very concept of legal but harmful speech is ludicrous. Speech can't hurt you unless you let it.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 35. in UK

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Why changes to the Government's Online Safety Bill are controversialMeasures which would have forced big technology platforms to remove “legal but harmful” material have been axed from the Online Safety Bill ⬇️ emsferg explains emsferg Good news. A very dangerous bill. There are plenty of other ways to protect children from online content rather than hand more power to governments we cannot trust.
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »

i morning briefing: Can the Online Safety Bill really protect children?📨 i morning briefing: Can the Online Safety Bill really protect children? 📬 Sign up to our Early Edition newsletter here ⬇️
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »

Online Safety Bill Denounced For Being 'So Watered Down It's A Joke'The Samaritans called the changes to the bill a 'hugely backward step'.
Source: HuffPostUK - 🏆 108. / 51 Read more »

Government denies weakening Online Safety BillNew law will not require removal of 'legal but harmful' content, which critics said risked free speech. The Conservatives promise to protect children from harmful online material such as suicide clips lasted less than a week.
Source: BBCTech - 🏆 81. / 55 Read more »

Plan to make big tech remove harmful content axedMinister denies weakening the Online Safety Bill after dropping the 'legal but harmful' material measures. Surprise, surprise. Mainstream media scum like you are just trying to hang on and you need censorship. You dinosaurs won’t be around much longer. Translation: basically we asked elon musk to ban content we don't like and harms our credibility, and he said F Off.
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Online Safety laws forcing companies to take down 'legal but harmful' posts axed by governmentAs first revealed by i earlier this month, Culture Secretary Michelle Donelan is bringing forward changes to the Online Safety Bill when it returns to the Commons next week
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »