A California man is suing a psychic who he says falsely claimed she could remove a curse put on his marriage by a witch hired by his ex-girlfriend.
Mauro Restrepo said Sophia Adams promised she could save his marriage if he paid $5,100 to exorcise the spell, according to a fraud suit filed with the Torrance Superior Court. Ms Adams allegedly told Mr Restrepo he and his family would be "unhappy and in danger" if the curse was not lifted.Included among several other allegations made by Mr Restrepo are charges of negligence, civil conspiracy and both intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.Ms Adams' website bills her as a "psychic love specialist" and "Ph.
During the session, Ms Adams read his tarot cards and told him he had "mala suerte", or "bad luck", placed on him "by a witch hired by his ex-girlfriend" and unless the curse was removed it would ruin Mr Restrepo, his children and his marriage, the court papers say. Despite making an initial deposit of $1,000, Mr Restrepo says that Ms Adams' "did not in any way help" his marriage and he had been suffering from sleepless nights, anxiety and anguish.
This is the type of person who falls for the Nigerian email scams.
Does this pave the way for litigation against pastors and priests, who falsely extoll the efficacy of intercessory prayer, whilst fleecing the gullible?
It has all the trappings and tendencies of Trump...
I expect the physic saw this coming and has prepared.
A fresh LoL to you. 😆
tam metafizik uzmanlarını izlerken, bunların attığı twit ⤴️
M
Huh 🤔👌🏻
Lol
All psychics are frauds.
I’ve been intercepting distance Reiki for months now.
What was his ex curse..... Gonorrhea
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The Psychic, shouldn't have promised that, as things of this nature don't always turn out the way people would like them to, The Psychic I bet has learned a valuable lesson here. SillySausage
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »