Both wards housed a total of 24 patients between February 9 and March 2, when China was still battling the deadly virus.
They found that virus-laden aerosols were mainly concentrated near and downstream from patients at up to 13 feet, though smaller quantities were found upstream at up to eight feet. High levels were also found on surfaces that are frequently touched like computer mice, trashcans, bed rails and door knobs.BRITAIN’s four million NHS staff are on the frontline in the battle against coronavirus.The Sun has launched an appeal to raise £1MILLION for NHS workers.We have teamed up with NHS Charities Together in their urgent Covid-19 Appeal to ensure the money gets to exactly who needs it.
izzonline The panic media is causing is doing wonders for society to be even more paranoid than before
Duh! Seriously?
I am sorry, but this is too much. Do the scientists also consider how many people living in depression right now because of all the news that sometimes become not realistic anymore?!
Obviously if you watch smoke someone breaths out from a cig you can see how far there breath can travel and that's far
Scafemongering, lieing tosspots.
Doh
How many things are they changing with this?
I don't think asda make car parks big enough to accomodate distancing this large!
That doesn't seem to be the case in Sweden.
incorrect the 2m distance is 6.ft7 (even though H_S_E and GOVUK have it stated wrong on their site. so its less than twice the distance
Disgusting Chinese
2 miles to be on the safe side? Yet it's still not a High Consequence Infectious Disease as shown here, when its threat level was downgraded on the 19th of March 2020, as confirmed here via this official web site..
Bees sting, aligators bite, shit happens... Let’s get back to work.
Ffs really 😮👀😷🤔
Try more than double that!
This is why we should ALL be wearing masks.
🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »
Source: Cosmopolitan UK - 🏆 134. / 51 Read more »