Racial difference in BMI and lung cancer diagnosis: analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial - BMC Cancer

  • 📰 medical_xpress
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 10 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 7%
  • Publisher: 51%

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines

The obesity paradox in lungcancer diagnosis may differ by race

]. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age 55 to 74 years and current or former smoker with at least a 30 pack-year history; former smokers had to have quit within the past 15 years. Screening, either LDCT or chest radiography, was offered to NLST participants annually for 3 consecutive years. The median follow-up time was 7 years. Approval for this project was obtained from the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Data Access System on October 16, 2017 and renewed on November 2, 2020.

]. In this analysis, we combined underweight with normal since less than 1% of NLST participants were underweight. We also excluded 326 participants who did not have BMI recorded.

Source: Healthcare Press (healthcarepress.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 101. in UK

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Scientists discover how air pollution triggers lung cancerScientists said Saturday they had identified the mechanism through which air pollution triggers lung cancer in non-smokers, a discovery one expert hailed as 'an important step for science—and for society'. physorg_com this sounds like another TheOnion News headline, just that is for real not a joke. physorg_com Just in, breathing bad air is bad for you! Scientists should also be finding out how many were on Symibcort that got blood clots...🤓
Source: medical_xpress - 🏆 101. / 51 Read more »

Cervical cancer signs as Jo Wilson given stage 3 diagnosisShe was relieved to have found out before it was too late
Source: nottslive - 🏆 96. / 52 Read more »

How the Dallas Mavericks CEO Took on Toxic CultureCancer, discrimination and toxic culture: Dallas Mavericks CEO Cynt Marshall has beaten them all You took on the racist Liberals Thank you so much.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »

Strategies for lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a physiological trial - Critical CareBackground Insufficient or excessive respiratory effort during acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) increases the risk of lung and diaphragm injury. We sought to establish whether respiratory effort can be optimized to achieve lung- and diaphragm-protective (LDP) targets (esophageal pressure swing − 3 to − 8 cm H2O; dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure ≤ 15 cm H2O) during AHRF. Methods In patients with early AHRF, spontaneous breathing was initiated as soon as passive ventilation was not deemed mandatory. Inspiratory pressure, sedation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and sweep gas flow (in patients receiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO)) were systematically titrated to achieve LDP targets. Additionally, partial neuromuscular blockade (pNMBA) was administered in patients with refractory excessive respiratory effort. Results Of 30 patients enrolled, most had severe AHRF; 16 required VV-ECMO. Respiratory effort was absent in all at enrolment. After initiating spontaneous breathing, most exhibited high respiratory effort and only 6/30 met LDP targets. After titrating ventilation, sedation, and sweep gas flow, LDP targets were achieved in 20/30. LDP targets were more likely to be achieved in patients on VV-ECMO (median OR 10, 95% CrI 2, 81) and at the PEEP level associated with improved dynamic compliance (median OR 33, 95% CrI 5, 898). Administration of pNMBA to patients with refractory excessive effort was well-tolerated and effectively achieved LDP targets. Conclusion Respiratory effort is frequently absent under deep sedation but becomes excessive when spontaneous breathing is permitted in patients with moderate or severe AHRF. Systematically titrating ventilation and sedation can optimize respiratory effort for lung and diaphragm protection in most patients. VV-ECMO can greatly facilitate the delivery of a LDP strategy. Trial registration: This trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov in August 2018 (NCT03612583).
Source: BioMedCentral - 🏆 22. / 71 Read more »