Nina Cresswell said her main motivation for speaking out was to "protect other women from risk"
She said detectives told her it would be difficult to prove as she had been drunk and gave conflicting descriptions of the colour of her attacker's beard. Following the ruling, she said: "I am hugely relieved and delighted at the judgment and I can't believe that I am finally free to speak the truth about the man who attacked me.
She dismissed Mr Hay's denials that the attack took place and ordered him to pay Ms Cresswell's legal costs. The judge also considered Ms Cresswell's beliefs that there was a "need to protect women from sexual abuse and the failure to prosecute sexual abuse cases".Image source,It is the first time that a public interest defence under the Defamation Act of 2013 has succeeded when an abuser has sued a victim for libel.
"Some tattooists are maybe frightened it could jeopardise their careers, or they just want an easy life.Ms Allen added: "It is the first such judgment, clarifying the law for victims of assault who have been silenced by their abusers and failed by the police.
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Daily_Record - 🏆 9. / 89 Read more »
Source: digitalspy - 🏆 56. / 63 Read more »
Source: LBC - 🏆 17. / 74 Read more »
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »
Murdoch group settled Prince William phone-hacking claim for ‘very large’ sum, UK court told\n\t\t\tKeep abreast of significant corporate, financial and political developments around the world.\n\t\t\tStay informed and spot emerging risks and opportunities with independent global reporting, expert\n\t\t\tcommentary and analysis you can trust.\n\t\t
Source: FT - 🏆 113. / 51 Read more »