National Archives sorry for blurring anti-Trump signs in Women's March photo

  • 📰 The Guardian
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 53%

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines

Washington institution admits it was wrong to digitally alter exhibition photo that included signage critical of Trump

The US National Archives apologized on Saturday after it emerged that a photo of the Women’s March included in signage for an exhibition on women’s suffrage had been altered to blur anti-Trump signs.“As the National Archives of the United States, we are and have always been completely committed to preserving our archival holdings without alteration.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

but not deep fake so it's ok

WHO did it?

Surprised they didn't blur out the first two letters of 'Women's March'

Someone or some people are responsible for the mutilations and should be ,at the very least, fired.

What are they marching for again ?

Sorry for doing it or sorry for being spotted doing it?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 84. in UK

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Anti-Trump slogans blurred out from photo in US National Archives'Modifying the image was an attempt on our part to keep the focus on the records' says archive spokeswoman Miriam Kleiman His Ministry of Truth sure is at work.
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »

US National Archives issues grovelling apology for blurring anti-Trump signs in rally photoAgency launches review 'so this does not happen again' Overview Censorship, another step towards dictatorship. Done! How many apologies has Trump offered?
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »

Alan Dershowitz: Trump impeachment acquittal would make me unhappyMember of Trump’s legal team says he’s acting ‘for the survival of the constitution’ but will have limited role in impeachment defence Me too! We have so much evidence we don’t want to waste it. I hope cross examiners ask about clients applying for Trump pardons.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

Quiz of the week: On Trump, Russia and the new Bond themeHave you been paying attention to what's been going on during the past seven days? We have. So the only way I found this week's quiz was by looking on your Twitterfeed! It wasn't on the front page of your website and searching brought up 3 January's quiz!
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Impeachment: is Trump set to survive and win a second term?As Democrats marched the articles to the Senate, the president basked in policy success. Many think re-election is coming That would simply put a final end to the American experiment. Probably By sabotaging Sanders as they did in 2016, Dems are ASSURING a Trump victory in 2020..
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

Friday briefing: Trump did break law, says watchdogAs impeachment trials opens, suspension of Ukraine aide is ruled illegal … warning of ‘fracking by stealth’ … and Putin’s war on Russian arts :) BUT HE BROKE IT PERFECTLY! Laws is probably more appropriate
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »