Campaigners have lost their legal challenge to the government's two-child limit on welfare payments.
One had health problems and was in low-paid work. The other fell pregnant while on the pill. Both had children born after April 2017 and so were affected financially by the policy. Lawyers representing two families who brought the legal challenge argued that the limit would cause "deep and inescapable child poverty" and "fails to recognise children as deserving of social protection in their own right".
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
Good having kids should be a choice can't afford them don't have them simple as
It's totally correct to cap at two children. Child benefit should also be capped but at 3. No need to have more than that. Your choice so you should pay not expect others to. Can't afford don't have
Good
I don't believe a woman would purposefully get pregnant in order to be able to claim under £14 a week in child benefit.
What did they expect, change a rule for millions for 2? The ego of female privilege! The reason it was changed in the first place because many woman were using having a kid as a business. If you can’t support kids, simple don’t have them!
rightly so.
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Cosmopolitan UK - 🏆 134. / 51 Read more »
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »
Source: Cosmopolitan UK - 🏆 134. / 51 Read more »
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »