How the Supreme Court Could Rule on Student Loan Forgiveness

  • 📰 TIME
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 99 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 43%
  • Publisher: 53%

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines

Legal experts say that even if the Supreme Court sides with the Biden Administration, there are still legal hurdles that will delay relief for borrowers

put on hold

Legal experts say it’s hard to predict how the Supreme Court will rule, given the many complicated questions at play. The court could eventually rule on the legal merits of the student loan forgiveness program. However, right now, the court is only deciding whether to allow the Eighth Circuit’s injunction blocking the program to continue.

“At least so far, the Supreme Court has shown an unwillingness to get involved in lower court proceedings around these preliminary injunction type of issues,” says Thomas Bennett, an associate professor of law at the University of Missouri, who studies federal courts and constitutional law. But the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that Missouri, one of the six states, likely has legal standing, saying that the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority , a student loan servicer, will lose revenue because of debt cancellation and “may well be an arm of the State of Missouri.” While the court did not yet rule on the legal arguments in the case, it granted a preliminary injunction, noting that the outcome of the case will affect the finances of millions of Americans.

In the 2007 case, Chief Justice John Roberts dissented—along with conservative justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito—arguing that Massachusetts should not have had standing to sue because the state had not suffered a concrete injury. “The constitutional role of the courts, however, is to decide concrete cases—not to serve as a convenient forum for policy debates,” Roberts wrote in his dissent.

Nonetheless, the Biden Administration criticized the Eighth Circuit’s reasoning for the injunction and argued that the plaintiffs lack standing to sue. “That analysis does not suffice to support any injunction—much less a universal injunction prohibiting the government from implementing a critically important policy with direct and tangible effects on millions of Americans,” Prelogar said in the filing.

Source: Education Headlines (educationheadlines.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

FJB

So strange because they didn't appeal the Public Servant student debt relief that paid out millions over the last year.

The birth of socialist America. Chinese- Tiktok worked.

So the president made this bill himself and passed it with executive authority. So no wonder Federal judges are knocking it down and stopping it. It was a play for voters in the first place and a shameful one at that.

Haha let the losers go get jobs and pay their loans off. Nothing but a lazy shit bag generation these days.

Or these deadbeats could just pay what they owe instead of looking to get out of it.

And what about the external debt?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 93. in UK

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Orkney amongst the latest areas to announce Supreme Court verdict rallySINCE the date for the Supreme Court's indyref case verdict was announced, the number of rallies being held to react across Scotland has continued…
Source: SunScotNational - 🏆 49. / 63 Read more »

Mum's battle reaches Supreme Court five years after daughter's deathMum's fight for justice reaches Supreme Court five years after disabled daughter's death
Source: LiveLancs - 🏆 10. / 87 Read more »

What will the Supreme Court decision mean for indyref2?Judges will rule on Wednesday morning whether the Scottish Parliament has the power to hold an independence referendum. The present Scottish parilament is not the Scottish parilament of old, that merged with the English parilament in 1707. This is golden opportunity for Britain to show the world how much they respect independence. Britain must not miss this opportunity. What part of 'Once in a generation' do these people not comprehend? FFS move on!
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Scottish independence supporters plan rallies after Supreme Court verdictJudges will issue a ruling on Wednesday on whether the Scottish Government can stage an IndyRef2 without prior agreement from Westminster. Seems like they know the outcome of the verdict will be a no to holding a referendum.😄 And they marched them up to the top of the hill and marched them down again Anti English fascist march
Source: Daily_Record - 🏆 9. / 89 Read more »

Mason Greenwood arrives at court for pre-trial hearingMason Greenwood has been again granted bail after appearing in court this morning End Game for his career. Is that Barry from Four Lions with him? Mason Noncewood
Source: MENnewsdesk - 🏆 23. / 69 Read more »