I have questions about my own sexuality and gender identity.
So what Chris Todd is worried about, what this law purports to restrict, or at least according to its own sponsor, is “risk.” It is designed to abate the risks that exist in his mind that a senior in high school might see a drag performance and think, Well, first of all, I’m not a politician. I’m a civil rights attorney. And my job is to make sure that those people in the mushy middle never have to worry about these issues. Because it is people like my clients, who are at sort of the fringes, who are most vulnerable.
We also can say that there are certain things that are so utterly without redeeming social value, that even if the person making them didn’t technically violate any laws, we ban this. Snuff films. They’re simply revolting, horrible, and dangerous. What would you say to the person who says your argument against the law comes down to drag queens and kings should have the same protections as pornographers?the same as pornographers, because drag queens, by definition, are not doing pornography. Right now this law attempts to reframe drag performances as harmful, and claims to only regulate performances that are harmful to minors.
Source: Entertainment Trends (entertainmenttrends.net)
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Source: TheAthletic - 🏆 54. / 63 Read more »
Source: HuffPostUK - 🏆 108. / 51 Read more »
Source: digitalspy - 🏆 56. / 63 Read more »
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »
Source: Glasgow_Times - 🏆 76. / 59 Read more »