The dispute was due to be played out in court. It would have meant a public examination of the accuracy and speed of the testing system, at a time when it has come under serious criticism.
"The tests are reliable and effective, the laboratories that undertake them have been reviewed and assessed by experts and the percentage of false negatives or positives is tiny," said a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson. Diagnostics AI claimed UgenTec's analysis of a trial run of 2,000 samples was flawed. In some cases, it claimed UgenTec found negative coronavirus results, when the results were actually positive or inconclusive.
"None of these samples refer to actual results given to patients or the public and to imply any public health impact is wrong. Live tests were not being supported by our software at the time which was in the process of being implemented. As illustrated by independent tests, we have every confidence in our software and the services we provide.
AmberTwemlow Oh fuck did it mention Graphs What is this fascination with graphs Absolute madness again
AmberTwemlow What another complete fuck up A contract worth one mill Get paid out at 2 mill How much money is this gov wasting it’s scandalous
Government to pay two million pounds of tax payers money to avoid scrutiny . Boris is a lying buffoon.
'Taxpayer to pay £2m...'
Illiterate BBC !
Peanuts ,!!!!wait till people wake up to this Hoax and how the Bbc and goverment lied
That’s just dandy, we pay
Government settled to avoid scrutiny!! This story will be lost sadly it does expose the ongoing failure of Boris Johnson and his desperate unchecked, uncontrolled ministers. While they fiddle at the edges our friends and family died alone in virtual emotional prison BorisOut
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »