HE TOMATOES look like any other. But unlike those which sit on supermarket shelves, they are a source of vitamin. That is owing to the clever work of scientists at the John Innes Centre in Norwich, who have used gene-editing techniques to boost the tomatoes’ nutritional value. By making small deletions in the plant’s genome they blocked the production of a certain enzyme, prompting the plants to accumulate provitaminon exposure to ultraviolet light, such as that found in sunlight.
The criticisms of gene-editing are flimsy. There is no evidence that the technique is unsafe . Unintended side-effects are more likely to occur with conventional plant-breeding methods, which irradiate seeds to generate random mutations. The worry that businesses will be able to patent gene-edited crops, making farmers beholden to big agricultural companies, is also unfounded.
A more fundamental problem is the guiding principle of the British government’s gene-editing regulation. Rather than look at the actual properties of the crops produced, it focuses on the process by which they were produced: if the crop “could have occurred naturally”, it is allowed.
Every living organism is 'genetically modified'. It's time to get over the irrational fear and embrace the complicated.
GMO is so last year. 2022 is all about the gene-edit.
HOLY CRAP! Oh, God save us from lab and gene altered foods. This will bring havoc to health as we know it on the most fundamental level. If only man would just stop trying to play God, we would all be better off.
Of course I like plasticky tomatoes! Can you make them bigger?
I think that most Britons are more interested in the price of food than in its origin
nonsense, Gentically modified veggies will add extra sugar thats it. will make world more diabetic
👍
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Guardian Science - 🏆 107. / 51 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Source: BBCScienceNews - 🏆 87. / 53 Read more »
Source: Guardian news - 🏆 28. / 68 Read more »
Source: BBCScienceNews - 🏆 87. / 53 Read more »
Source: BBCScienceNews - 🏆 87. / 53 Read more »