Bolton lawyers seek to question Trump officials over book

Bolton lawyers seek to question Trump officials over book

9/25/2020 3:19:00 AM

Bolton lawyers seek to question Trump officials over book

Lawyers for former national security adviser John Bolton have told a judge that they want to interview White House officials following new allegations that a pre-publication review of his tell-all book was politicized in and effort to block its release

is entitled to profits, is still pending even though a judge months ago refused to block the release.Arguments in the Justice Department's lawsuit against Bolton over his book, “The Room Where it Happened,” took place after a new court filing from a lawyer for Ellen Knight, the White House official with whom Bolton worked for months to ensure that his manuscript was free of classified information that could possibly threaten U.S. national security.

Gridlock as thousands try to flee Paris ahead of month-long lockdown Nice attack: Politicians demand action to 'wipe out Islamo-fascism' 'Covid toes' that turn purple from the disease can last for MONTHS

In the filing, Knight said she determined in late April that the manuscript no longer contained classified information and told Bolton she had no more proposed changes. But after she advised National Security Council lawyers that she intended to clear the book for publication, she was told to take no action.

Weeks later, she learned that a White House official who she says had no previous classification experience had been instructed to conduct a second review of the manuscript. That official, Michael Ellis, flagged hundreds of passages that he believed were still classified. Knight disagreed with that conclusion.

The book, which details Bolton's 17 months as Trump's top national security adviser, contained description of Trump's conversations with foreign leaders that could be seen as damaging to the president. Those include accounts that Trump withheld aid to Ukraine for political reasons and that he asked China's President Xi Jinping for help in the election.

The Justice Department in June sued Bolton to block the release of the book. Though U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth denied the request since hundreds of thousands of copies had already been distributed, he also sharply scolded Bolton for moving ahead with the book's publication without waiting for formal, written authorization that it had been approved.

The case is still pending as the government looks to be able to seize profits from the book's sales. Lamberth heard arguments Thursday as he weighs whether to dismiss the lawsuit or to allow it to move forward into an information-sharing stage known as discovery.

It was not immediately clear when the judge might rule.Kirk argued that Knight's behind-the-scenes account opened the door to arguments that the White House acted in bad faith during the classification review process, with an eye not toward protecting national security but rather to avoiding embarrassment.

Singapore breathalyser Covid-19 test works in one minute, firm says Earth-sized planet is seen roaming the Milky Way without a parent star Jihadists celebrate Nice terror attack and call for more attacks

He requested access to White House communications on the matter as well as depositions of senior White House officials, including current national security adviser Robert O'Brien, who according to Knight's statement had directed Ellis to undertake another classification review after Knight had completed hers.

“The government cannot and does not dispute that the law does not permit it to classify information for the purpose of preventing embarrassment," he said.Lamberth, who has previously said that Bolton's actions may have exposed him to possible prosecution, chided the lawyer for what he said was a “political diatribe” unrelated to the question of whether Bolton mishandled classified information.

Justice Department lawyers, meanwhile, maintain that Bolton shirked his obligation to wait for formal clearance and wasn't entitled to abandon the pre-publication review process out of frustration.“What is unprecedented here is a national security adviser releasing his memoir (of his time as) a national security adviser within months of leaving that job,” said Justice Department lawyer Jennifer Dickey.

____Follow Eric Tucker on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/etuckerAP Read more: The Independent »

Son of Walter Wallace Jr says 'white racist cops' killed his father

Zamir Wallace said he would 'always play around' with his father, who he said also taught him how to be a man.

White House 'pressured official to say John Bolton book was security risk'Ex-National Security Council official claims she was pressured her to say manuscript contained sensitive information after her department had cleared it Who knew they could stoop so low? ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯ WhoKnew Yeah, the abuses of power are rampant and clear. What else to expect from a crime family but criminal strong arm tactics? A nasty political tactic, as usual, from Trump's White House. And you know who's a security risk? Our fascist president.

Trump lawyers: DA's fight for tax returns built on innuendoPresident Donald Trump’s lawyers say a New York prosecutor is resorting to “speculation and innuendo” to justify a subpoena for his tax returns

Trump supports Kentucky National Guard response to Breonna Taylor protests'It's a positive thing': Trump supports Kentucky National Guard response to Breonna Taylor protests O.K.🙄 this is not news. Big Wup! SaveEOTC Who cares? Ryan Bastard Reynolds is buying Wrexham lads.

Trump 'not a fan' of Meghan Markle as she and Harry urge Americans to voteDonald Trump wished Prince Harry luck 'because he's going to need it' after telling reporters at a press briefing he was not a fan of Meghan Markle following a video interpreted as an endorsement for Joe Biden We are not fans of her either Well, Well, Well......I never thought in a month of Sunday’s that I would EVER agree with Trump on ANYTHING. There has to be a first for everything! MeghanMarkleTheCharlatanDuchess megxit

Trump won't commit to peaceful transfer of power as he pushes to 'get rid' of ballots'We're going to have to see what happens' Trump won't commit to peaceful transfer of power after US presidential election Leader of the country with the largest militia in the world won't commit to respecting the decisions of the country he was elected to represent. Another civil war Democrats set the standard. 🤣😂

Coronavirus: Trump says 200,000 US deaths is 'a shame'The president has been criticised for his handling of the pandemic as fears grow that the crisis could worsen over the winter.