Sign up to get the best content of the week, and great gaming deals, as picked by the editors.Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsThere was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
Source: News Formal (newsformal.com)
nah, probably 65
Probably being the word to take notice on. 🤨
Lol He just pointed the gun at the cops to see how many cops would shoot at him, he didn’t actually think the cops would shoot him…. This was fully intentional by Blizzard or it wouldn’t have been there smh god damn greedy developers, they need to go blizzardentertainment
Yeah...But you know they were definitely thinking about it. Otherwise why have it as an option?
If they weren't as least considering it, they wouldn't have asked. 🤷
yet*
Yeah... pRoBaBlY...
Blizz literally pulled a 'It's just a joke, bruh!'
More than 50 cents for a skin is a scam.
If the skin does not provide a competitive advantage and it's purely asthetic then I don't see the need or gripe. In the end demand dictates price. Demand is driven by players, not Blizzard.
It's Blizzard, you think they won't? LoL
They want to be Riot so badly. They will 100% charge that if they feel they can do it without a massive uproar from all 2000 people across the globe that will play Overwatch 2.
They’re going to be $40 watch it.
'The survey was designed to check player tolerance for price gouging, to work out the perfect amount that enough people will pay, so they can add another billion dollars to their profit reports next year. Bobby needs another boat.' Fixed that for ya.
Of course they won't charge $45 for a skin. They will charge $40
You say that now… but everything changes post release now a days.
if they can, they will
yesh not 45, but 30 LOL
Ever heard of one of their small niche games called World of Warcraft? It’s understandable that you haven’t only doing this as your business for years.
After seeing Diablo Immortal, I doubt that.
'Probably'
otherwise known as 'testing the waters' before they start charging $45
Testing the waters. How much has Diablo Immortal ruined a players perception of what is acceptible in terms of microstransactions so they can get away with because 'it's not as bad as in Diablo Immortal'? Shit's been like this forever.
Square Enix does it on Opera Omnia lol fuck it
If you buy cosmetics you’re a clown. Argue with the wall.
yes they will, if they can get away with it....
Yeah right
Well, yeah. They probably won't *now*. 😂
Sure
It’s Blizzard
Some extra 20 bucks with this price will buy me the latest titles like spider man, god of war, just saying.
Idc I've lost all interest at this point in ow2.
More like: 'Blizzard probably isn't going to charge you $45 for an Overwatch 2 skin...yet.'
'probably'
Fuck these mindless shits
Isn't this what your 'experts' called for though? Mollie, Natalie and Lauren? This is what happens when people are picked to tick boxes and not picked because they are good at their job. And future/editor knows it why they mostly do fluff pieces now.
They said 45 dollars wasn’t enough.
“Probably”
Please Activision was already charging 20 bucks a skin for Modern Warfare, so hard doubt that 'probably'.
'Probably' but I wouldn't put it past them to try anyway.
I didn't read the article....bit I REALLY Hate that animation/art style...its Lazy and gross looking...like early toy story human modeling...stop doing that style animators and producers...ssscchhhttaaaahhhhpppp
Why did anyone actually think they were going to do that. Maybe I'm ignorant but I cannot think of a single game that sells 45 dollar skins.
“40dollars” probably.
does anyone even believe a word from ACTIVISION BLIZZARD?
lilToastyToast
its coming in overwatch 3, calm down people
45 no but 30? Probably
At least until they're sure they can get away with it.
its 44.99$
after a poor response...
Because the skin will cost $44,99 😎
The game is f2p, with no loot boxes, they say it won’t be $45 because that’s probably too cheap.
Suuuuuuuuuure they aren't. They also won't charge hundreds of thousands of dollars for you to max yourself out in Diablo Immortal.
I thought this was Hard Drive, what the hell
But they were totally considering it, though, weren't they?
lol, blizzard shouldn't be charging me for any fuckin skins frankly. The bullshit excuse of 'it supports the game' doesn't have much weight when they killed the original they were barely supporting to begin with. Skins only serves to make titty milk stealer Bobby Kotick richer
slow news day?
Like as they said with the WoW race change survey?
They should just rename this game Overwatch: Immortal. It's obvious what they're trying.
'We just wanted to see how much outrage it would cause, if any.' They'll be priced at 39.99 I guarantee it.
Pfft such lies.
I wouldnt hold them to that
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: pcgamer - 🏆 38. / 67 Read more »
Source: pcgamer - 🏆 38. / 67 Read more »
Source: BBCLondonNews - 🏆 115. / 51 Read more »
Source: LBCNews - 🏆 75. / 59 Read more »
Source: Glasgow_Live - 🏆 4. / 97 Read more »
Source: VideoGamerCom - 🏆 83. / 55 Read more »