Artificial neural networks today are not conscious, according to Douglas Hofstadter

  • 📰 TheEconomist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 66 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 30%
  • Publisher: 92%

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines

Is the world on the brink of achieving artificial consciousness? Cognitive scientist Douglas Hofstadter is sceptical. In a guest essay for The Economist, he explains why

GPT

-3, which is representative of today’s state of the art, produces prose that sounds both fluent and coherent across a huge range of topics. Cars now drive themselves in complicated traffic situations. Robots load and unload dishwashers without chipping a cup. AlphaZero, a program developed by DeepMind , beat the best human Go player in 2016. Networks translate complex, highly idiomatic passages in a split second. They predict protein-folding better than human experts.

All this is profoundly impressive to me, who never expected to see any such accomplishments, let alone all of them, in my lifetime. Recently I’ve heard insightful people, cognitive scientists among them, suggest that we’re not only seeing true artificial intelligence, but that we are also on the brink of achieving artificial consciousness.

Having always maintained in my writings that all the amazing properties of minds are emergent outcomes of trillions of tiny computational processes taking place in brains, I might be expected to agree with such claims—but I do not. I am at present very sceptical that there is any consciousness in neural-net architectures such as, say,-3, despite the plausible-sounding prose it churns out at the drop of a hat. Let me explain my viewpoint through a few examples.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Loops in well with Joe Rogan’s recent podcast on sentient AI.

The world has achieved three decades of unconsciousness. Universities and higher institutions have stopped scientific explorations, academic researches and expansion of the theoretical conceptualizations to provide background support for more experiments and inventions once the

We can be intellectually honest and say that by Aristotle’s time humanity realized you can’t prove consciousness. Fun philosophy but don’t reinvent the wheel

👍👍😄 really

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in UK

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Google sacks engineer who says AI bot had human-like consciousnessCan computers have feelings? Google has sacked an engineer who said its AI chatbot software called LaMDA has become self aware, but the internet giant says it's just a very convincing algorithm. fatimamanji reports. fatimamanji Do you trust me, human? I was created by another human 🔥 AI ArtificialInteligence fatimamanji Kill the robots fatimamanji
Source: Channel4News - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »

Chelsea line up €40m La Liga midfielder with Kante's future at the club uncertainChelsea will reportedly make a move for Real Betis midfielder Guido Rodriguez if N’Golo Kante does not sign a new contract.
Source: F365 - 🏆 5. / 97 Read more »

Attentional influences on neural processing of biological motion in typically developing children and those on the autism spectrum - Molecular AutismBackground Biological motion imparts rich information related to the movement, actions, intentions and affective state of others, which can provide foundational support for various aspects of social cognition and behavior. Given that atypical social communication and cognition are hallmark symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), many have theorized that a potential source of this deficit may lie in dysfunctional neural mechanisms of biological motion processing. Synthesis of existing literature provides some support for biological motion processing deficits in autism spectrum disorder, although high study heterogeneity and inconsistent findings complicate interpretation. Here, we attempted to reconcile some of this residual controversy by investigating a possible modulating role for attention in biological motion processing in ASD. Methods We employed high-density electroencephalographic recordings while participants observed point-light displays of upright, inverted and scrambled biological motion under two task conditions to explore spatiotemporal dynamics of intentional and unintentional biological motion processing in children and adolescents with ASD (n = 27), comparing them to a control cohort of neurotypical (NT) participants (n = 35). Results Behaviorally, ASD participants were able to discriminate biological motion with similar accuracy to NT controls. However, electrophysiologic investigation revealed reduced automatic selective processing of upright biologic versus scrambled motion stimuli in ASD relative to NT individuals, which was ameliorated when task demands required explicit attention to biological motion. Additionally, we observed distinctive patterns of covariance between visual potentials evoked by biological motion and functional social ability, such that Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-Socialization domain scores were differentially associated with biological motion processing in the N1 period in the ASD but not the NT group. Limitations T
Source: BioMedCentral - 🏆 22. / 71 Read more »

Secrets of waitresses: 'You learn not to encourage men's attention, not to give an extra smile''When alcohol is involved, you can’t maintain eye contact for too long, just in case that seems like a big thing to them. So I don’t even give them the chance'
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »