Arizona’s midterm races are full of election deniers

  • 📰 TheEconomist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 28 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 92%

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines

Among them is the Republican Senate candidate, who is closing in on his rival

, in Arizona, is a place that Americans usually hear a lot about on election nights. The swingy municipality—home to Phoenix and its—is a big prize for candidates. Donald Trump carried it in 2016 and Joe Biden won it in 2020. But this year Maricopa County made headlines weeks before election day. In late October two armed men camped out near an early-ballot drop-box in the city of Mesa, east of Phoenix, and menaced voters who dared exercise their constitutional right to vote.

The intimidation of voters has become more common since 2020, as many Republicans continue to spread thethat Mr Trump beat Joe Biden in that year’s presidential election. Perhaps no state embodies the embrace of election denialism better than Arizona. The state’s senate president led an “audit” of the 2020 results; it found no evidence of fraud.

Kari Lake, a former journalist now running for governor, has not said definitively whether she would accept the results of her race were she to lose it . At her watch party during the

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

I think the AZCardinals should take this tack with the rest of their season. Who says they're finishing last in the NFCWest? Just because the lamestream media gives us some results on Sunday?!? Everyone knows NFL officiating is a few holding calls away from being fraudulent!

Apparently The Economist is full of liberals who forgot they rejected every election for 20 years

Everyone should be accepting the results because all results are planned out, why do you think it is a two party system...because it is esier to manipulate. Democracy is fake, THEY would never allow that level of control to be given to the people.

Tell me you're clutching at straws for a story without telling me you're clutching at straws for a story

Simply by media asking that question they fall into the narrative that it is a choice.

Character Murder Discipline 1.01 Remember when some claimed the 2016-election was stolen, because Trump won? I do. Russia. Steele Dossier. Hillary Clinton. The tangled web you weave.

Sort of like HillaryClinton? I won't wait for your in depth reporting. Hypocrite

Of course. How can you say the election was fair before it even happens? Nobody can see the future.

You must really hate her to spend any time on this embarrassment of an article. Meaningless mush!

She’s miles ahead the only way she loses is if they stop the count just as she’s about to win, then take a few days to count illegal ballots behind closed doors.

This is twisting words. Every candidate has the right to contest an election if they feel they were irregularities of significance. So what candidate realistically is going to say they will accept the results, before the election has occurred?

Spoiler alert: She won't.

She’s not going to lose so it’s kind of irrelevant.

Why can't he just get over it. Trump lost because he didn't get enough votes.

Technically, he is correct. More voters will cast their votes for Mark Kelly, using the voting machines to do so.

Voting machine the most powerful weapon that leftists have to win ,look all presidential election in Latin American.

Because he is losing?

You should *really* consider noting upfront that this is a lie.

What do all these graphics have in common: The support for Dems declining because of the recessionary decline in the economy, and the rise in living costs due to inflation. By the time the GOP takes over, we will see easing of the decline, which they will take credit for.

The Economist is an election interference / fraud denier. When will they report on the Big Lies that led to the Biden pResidency disaster: - Russia collusion hoax - Steel Dossier - Hunter Biden laptop was Russian Disinformation

They are openly stealing the election, they have stated they will. And no one has the courage to deny them their abilities to do so.

Joe Biden, with his 'Jim Crow 2.0' is spreading election disinformation in order to cast doubt about these midterms and the 2024 election.

2020 election was compromised.

You guys promoted trump Russia collusion for four years

Have you also called Democrats that denied election results (such as Abrams, Hillary, Biden) “election deniers” as well — OR are you just playing your role as the propaganda arm of the ruling party pretending to be a legitimate news organization? 🙄

He’s not closing in… because he’s leading.

The more I see this 'election denier' bs used to marginaliz legitimate political grievances, the more I want to be an election denier too.

Maybe stick to the economy

You’re ridiculous

You know no one except your Leftist bubble cares about your “election denier” nonsense, right? Even the President doesn’t actually care or he wouldn’t have promoted an “election denier” to press Secretary.

are nazis and racists

Although I am an ambivalent conservative, I pray that we don’t end in a senate and house dominated by republicans. That is a clear way to limit our freedoms and rights.

Cry more

Didn't read but I'm assuming this means Hillary is involved. The all time greatest election denier.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in UK

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Misogynistic and predatory behaviour remains “prevalent” among police officers, new report concludesThe report by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) revealed cases in which officers had made a point of stopping cars driven by women they deemed attractive in a practice referred to as a “booty patrol”.
Source: StylistMagazine - 🏆 133. / 51 Read more »

Conte celebrates among Marseille fans and Kane dances as O'Hara demands creditAntonio Conte was seen celebrating among seemingly disgruntled fans after Tottenham’s winner in the 2-1 victory at Marseille. The Spurs boss was sat in the stands at the Stade Velodrome due t…
Source: talkSPORT - 🏆 91. / 53 Read more »

Frontiers | SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody trajectories in mothers and infants over two months following maternal infectionInfants exposed to caregivers infected with SARS-CoV-2 may have heightened infection risks relative to older children due to their more intensive care and feeding needs, and may experience more severe infection due to their less developed immune systems. However, there has been limited research on COVID-19 outcomes in exposed infants beyond the neonatal period. Between June 2020 – March 2021, we conducted interviews and collected capillary dried blood from SARS-CoV-2 infected mothers and their infants (aged 1-36 months) for up to two months following maternal infection onset (COVID+ group, 87% breastfeeding, n dyads=46 dyads). Comparative data were also collected from breastfeeding mothers with no known SARS-CoV-2 infection or exposures (breastfeeding control group, n dyads=26), and mothers who tested SARS-CoV-2 negative after experiencing symptoms or close contact exposure (COVID- group, n dyads=11, 73% breastfeeding). Dried blood samples were assayed for anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD IgG and IgA positivity and anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 + S2 IgG concentrations. Within the COVID+ group, the mean probability of seropositivity among infant samples was significantly lower than that of corresponding maternal samples (IgG 0.54 vs. 0.87; IgA 0.33 vs. 0.85), with likelihood of infant infection positively associated with the number of maternal symptoms and other household infections reported. COVID+ mothers reported a lower incidence of COVID-19 symptoms among their infants as compared to themselves and other household adults, and infants had similar PCR positivity rates as other household children. No samples returned by COVID- mothers or their infants tested antibody positive. Among the breastfeeding control group, 44% of mothers but none of their infants tested antibody positive in at least one sample. Results support previous research demonstrating minimal risks to infants following maternal COVID-19 infection, including for breastfeeding infants.
Source: medical_xpress - 🏆 101. / 51 Read more »

Association of Vaginal Progesterone With Prevention of Recurrent Preterm BirthThis cohort study evaluates the association of vaginal progesterone treatment with prevention of recurrent preterm birth among patients with a singleton pregnancy.
Source: medical_xpress - 🏆 101. / 51 Read more »