Amy Coney Barrett to say she will judge cases on law not personal views

  • 📰 The Guardian
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 53%

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines

In opening remarks at confirmation hearing on Monday, supreme court nominee will say court ‘should not try’ to create policy

Amy Coney Barrett, Donald Trump’s latest controversial nominee for the US supreme court, will tell senators in her high-stakes confirmation hearing this week that she will approach cases based on the law, not her personal views, as Democrats urged her to step aside on upcoming contentious cases.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Yeah right and I have the body of an odonis

Yes,and I still believe in adebar who brings the babies 🤣😂😅

Liar.

She always has this pained expression, like the weight of the world's on her shoulders. Is it to look righteous, professional, studious? Considering she feels she was chosen by God to do this work, you'd think she'd look more serene. Maybe it's her archaic beliefs that does it!

The thing about being on a court which is the ultimate arbitrator of law is that there is no settled law for you and you get to make your personal views the law.

Bullshit. Wait for it.

The Handmaiden speaketh

They all say that just like politicians who say they are quitting to spent more time with their family. Really?

Do you believe, Muttley?

are there any judges who judge on personal view?

WHAT her job is interpretation of law which isn't always as unambiguous as we want it, ofc she's gonna rule after her own, personal beliefs, why is this even a question

She has already shown how she will vote and her backers tell the tale

Because she said?

Genuine question from across the pond: If all Supreme Court judges respect the law as written, why is it important to appoint a new judge with a particular political stance?

Puede hacer lo mismo un algoritmo

Liar

Unless her husband disagrees.

What a load of crap! How can such partiality be even legal? The biggest paradox our our times

Well, that’s news.

Laws are open to interpretation. AmyConeyBarrett will interpret them according to her eighteenth century quasi-religious beliefs. We need the SupremeCourt to be open minded and forward looking.

It’s the year two thousand and twenty for fug sake!

Hmmmmm. Don’t have her

Our demand is support the movement.SARSMUSTEND

It is the job of a Supreme Court judge to interpret the law as it is written, not to make law. But some judges forget that.

She’s not being honest

She would say that, wouldn't she?

...until she makes her personal views the law.

Hmmm.

Was that an option?

She is extremely intelligent, she will bend the law until it breaks to make it fit her zealous religious cult like fever. She has no interest in making judgments to fit all the people.

She is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge....period, end of story.

That's a, relief since her personal belief led to her and her family meeting the President in an enclosed space with none of them wearing masks.

I don’t trust this person 💯 because she’s endorsed by an irresponsible and incompetent Trump!!!

Bullshit, she has taken an overrrididing oath.

Do pigs fly in the USA as well. This I must see.

That’s what she wants you to believe, that she is bias free and that not only God backs her up, but theinstifioms (law) do too! Power from above to prove she’s right and sinners are wrong.

🤮

Hmmm

I like her. I like how she is for the law and nothing but the law.❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍👍👍🧐🚒

Nobody believes this: not the Republicans nor the democrats. Since her Master Trump can say anything and remain in office perhaps ACB should go full on blurt. She’ll be approved anyway. None of it makes a difference except the election

For evangelicals that is basically impossible.

Never trust religious freaks. Don't forget they believe in fairy tales 🤮

Then she should be questioned on her personal views of the law.

Don’t they all say that?

What else will she say at this point?

What? She'll make the laws. What will those decisions be made on?

She “says” a lot of things. Watch what she has done. She is like all the other judges on The Federalist recommended list: extremely conservative, rigid, unaware of social progress in the past 50 years. She would be a disaster on the Supreme Court.

Narrator: “Oh course, Amy Coney Barrett was also a lying POS”

Yeah, sure.

Well of course she will. She also never wore a bloody mask.

Liar.

Law divined from what people may have thought when horse theft was a capital crime.

Yeah. That seems totally believable...

She is an 'originalist', which simply implies, that, if my forefathers were a bunch of bigoted racist, then I shall also continue carry the baton of unwarranted disparagement around.

Bullshit

Rubbish, no Trumpite abides by the law.

Sure.

Yeah, right...

So what.

The GOP is the party of liars, crooks and traitors. Their word is worth 1 Ruble. TRE45ON GOP GOPBetrayedAmerica MAGA MAGA2020 UnfitForOffice VoteOutTheGOP PutinOwnsGOP WeWillVote Election2020

Amy Coney Barrett is in a cult that dictates she be subservient to her husband. So what will she do if her husband doesn't agree with the law?

Can anyone over in the US give us examples of her work as a judge backs her personal assessment of her impartiality?

it sounds ridiculous!She exhibited senselessness of unqualified judger for Supreme court,so she probably is lying as her master!

yes and the fork ran away with the spoon

Pfft! Yeah, right. 👌

That's what a person with integrity would do, so yes, she would rule based on law. Also why Democrats oppose her, since they can't imagine somebody not imposing their personal beliefs on others.

That’s a lie

‘Caca de Toro’ ! Partisan virus had already infected SCOTUS. She will catch partisanship as soon as elected to the Court. Trump with 3 Judges elected made SCOTUS to his image for the next 30 years

Barrett will judge based on her misguided interpretation of laws. She is no more fit to be a Supreme Court Justice than the man appointing her is fit to be President.

Just like atheists who believe all kinds of ideologies judge things according to their own wisdom. Except the gospel gives an extra dose of godly wisdom and an extra dose of the bible's wisdom of Solomon's proverbs and King David's psalms. In other words- Helpful wisdom to judge!

Yeah, on her cult's interpretation of God's Law.

Yea and Trump is an evangelicals Christian

Oh ok! That is so reassuring. That makes it all worth while

Of course she will!

And she is a liar.

Another liar

I call bullshit

AmyConeyBarrett's nomination to the SupremeCourt may require special prayers, even by those not typically inclined to praying. MitchMcConnell

BULLSHIT

Yeah, and I’m the queen of England

Until she’s sworn in. MerrickGarland

Yeah right Bullshit lies.

ShameOnGOP

Kina what creepy Kav said ...and he was lying too btw

Shouldn’t those coincide if you’re a judge?

RBG

'John Doe sued in federal court claiming sex discrimination after Purdue suspended him for a year and took away his Navy ROTC scholarship. Barrett concluded Purdue’s process was unfair and allowed his lawsuit to continue.' She sided with rapist, not the victim. AmyComeyBarrett

Gods law

She should recognize the inappropriate circumstances here and rec waiting until post election. If she were decent and if good judgment she would.

Can we have that written into her contract?

Sounds like bullshit. She's going to take away healthcare, give away states to Trump during the election, overturn roe vs wade, and try to implement a theocratic rule. We are a secular state! No religious nutjobs in our courts!

Here she is -a typical night out with the girls.

FashnActivists BULL SHIT

Everybody says that. They anything to win the nomination. The USA is royally screwed.

We saw how well-matched worked for Bill barr.

That is what she says. That was what all say.

Heard that one before.

Oh, are we doing parallels like on the SATs? Okay. Barrett is to -promising to judge on case law and not personal views after she’s confirmed- What Trump is to -promising to show his tax returns after he’s elected.

Sure!

Which laws? God's laws or US laws

She lies.

Enough for now. She is an enormous threat to our societal collective well-being. Pro guns, anti ACA,anti gay rights, anti women’s rights.... WTF? Why are the RWNJ’s in charge? Please help me understand!

I pray that she is swiftly confirmed, and that shortly there afterwards she votes to overturn Roe. Then abortion on demand can be banned in my country, forever. I have waited for this day my entire life, and now it is coming. Thank you, Jesus. Amen.

She would do well to follow the law and not politics

😮😮Biden and Harris hold a campaign event in Arizona and the local news can’t believe that not one supporter showed up!

Doubtful. She wouldn’t be 45’s top choice if that were the case.

Does anyone believe that she is not judgemental? Tainted by her religious beliefs, she can’t help herself applying her “standards” to anyone else. Religion is all about being judgemental.

This is the such a fraudulent talking point. Her interpretation of laws will be through the warped prism of her personal biases, otherwise she would be a computer & needless to say that this lady has some very “interesting” opinions.

She's lying.

which laws? the bible’s?

Bullshit.

Ha 😆 and I am a fly on Pence black hair.

She belongs in the eighteenth century, not the twentyfirst

That's whstvshe says now to get nomination through

Liar

Adolf Hitler called for equality and peace in the 1930's.

That’s so funny... if it wasn’t so serious!!😡

Watched her give a talk. Liked her. Liked what she was saying. Sounds very nice. But in my opinion it was all for show. She said the things you expect her to say. Doesn’t discuss her religious “group”. I’ve read tomorrow’s statement. Exactly like her talk. I don’t trust her.

So she'll just go against her life's work. Sure she will...

i thought lying was a no-no in her faith

Crippen's defence lawyer was more convincing than this.

Ok

Oh my! Republicans has judges all across America and the are ramming one through now . They are ignoring 212,000 death and 8 million infections. Pro life

Which law? Church law?

She should refuse all offers until the youngest child turns 16. That goes for all mothers. This is the wrong message to send to young ladies.

FFS if you believe this, you’re clueless. Here is the evidence proving she’s not what this country needs.

🗑

Republicans has judges all across America and the are ramming one through now . They are ignoring 212,000 death and 8 million infections. Pro life

That’s BS and we all know it

Why start now?

Obviously, but some people are to stupid to understand the concept of the constitution as a Judge on the court

Uh huh.

She’s lying.

🙄Yes but first she'll make sure the law changes to reflect her personal views.

Did anyone expect her to say “to be honest. I’m going to scrap the Affordable Care Act...and RoeVWade...I’m killing that sucker...”

And not one sensible person believed her...

Well if she says so...

I can't help but thinking she's full of sh*t!

that’s funny

Pfffffft

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 84. in UK

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Five things to know about court nominee Amy Coney BarrettConfirmation hearings begin Monday for President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett No thanks It's a noooo.weneed someone who is independent and can do the job
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »

'It instilled such problems': ex-member of Amy Coney Barrett's faith group speaks outFormer insiders and religious scholars say scrutiny of Barrett’s connection to People of Praise is entirely legitimate Usual bias from the Guardian She is creepy AF. Not a healthy person. Left Wing propaganda. Interview a disgruntled ex member that left when she was 18 and report opinion as news. MSM is a joke.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

Five things to know about court nominee Amy Coney BarrettConfirmation hearings begin Monday for President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett No thanks It's a noooo.weneed someone who is independent and can do the job
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court pick vows to 'apply law as written'Amy Coney Barrett will justify her nomination by President Trump in a Senate hearing this week. Wow. I'm shocked she would say this at her job interview. She hasn’t got this far thinking any other way If ti were that simple we wouldn’t need judges surely?
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

'It instilled such problems': ex-member of Amy Coney Barrett's faith group speaks outFormer insiders and religious scholars say scrutiny of Barrett’s connection to People of Praise is entirely legitimate Usual bias from the Guardian She is creepy AF. Not a healthy person. Left Wing propaganda. Interview a disgruntled ex member that left when she was 18 and report opinion as news. MSM is a joke.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

Sturgeon admits she is 'not infallible' after confusion over cafe Covid rulesScottish first minister says she has tried not to criticise Boris Johnson because difficult decisions are being made These people are not in the war zone. They are civilians, children. Peace-loving world, don't be silent! We are looking for you, international human rights organizations PrayforGanja StopArmenianTerror ArmeniaBrokeCeasefire ArmeniaViolatesCeasefire Today BBC Tory Sun and Sky media backed SNP pulling out all the stops to keeps Sturgeons 50 useless Westminster seats keeping Johnston in power! C19 made me silly. 2mAlex made me forget? 5000 excess deaths in Scotland 1000/m Highest in the world Unusual for a politician to be honest
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »