Many of the 25 MPs who spoke on Monday echoed these sentiments.
Workers’ Party MP Leon Perera said that those who question lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer relationships on the grounds of religious faith or deep personal conviction should have the freedom to espouse their views respectfully, while those who believe in LGBTQ equality have the right to respectfully criticise opposing views. “They should not be cancelled. They should not be demonised.
MPs will vote on both Bills – the constitutional amendment and the repeal – at the end of debate on Tuesday. Mr Singh said Mr Faisal Manap was against the repeal as a matter of religion and conscience, while Mr Louis Chua was pro-repeal. Both men had tested positive for Covid-19 and did not attend Parliament.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Singapore Latest News, Singapore Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Repealing S377A the right step for Govt, Parliament: MinistersRepealing the longstanding law criminalising gay sex is the responsible thing for the Government and Parliament to do, two ministers said on Monday. There is a real risk that the courts could strike down Section 377A of the Penal Code with an impact on marriage and...
Source: thenewpaper - 🏆 7. / 63 Read more »
WP lifts whip on S377A, explains why it did not openly support repealMr Pritam Singh said politicians should not be seen as siding with particular groups on issues of great social division and contending values. Read more at straitstimes.com. WP is 🐓 🙄 Ms Sylvia Lim's point of NOT precluding the judiciary in deciding on matters of constitutionality is valid and pressing. There is the tyranny of the majority where the majority is NOT always right. What is necessary and essential is to get what's right, and practical, practicable
Source: straits_times - 🏆 5. / 69 Read more »
WP MPs take differing positions on repeal of S377AMr Pritam Singh said politicians should not be seen as siding with particular groups on issues of great social division and contending values. Read more at straitstimes.com.
Source: straits_times - 🏆 5. / 69 Read more »
Timeline: Repealing Section 377A and amending the Constitution to protect the definition of marriageSection 377A of the Penal Code is a colonial-era law that criminalises sex between men. Marriage is defined under Section 12 of the Women’s Charter as being between a man and a woman.
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »
Repealing 377A does not signal state’s hostility towards the family unit or religious freedom: Pritam SinghThe Leader of the Opposition also lifted the party whip for Workers' Party MPs on this debate. Let's talk it straight. Repealing 377A will degenerate and undermine the family unit and cohesion. Don't pretend. Over time when it ever becomes normalised here, we would grieve over the irreversible situation. It is not the end but only the beginning.
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »