, while another three said they would vote against the scrapping of the colonial-era law.
On Monday, five WP MPs spoke on S377A, which criminalises sex between men. Three of them – Mr Singh, Ms Sylvia Lim and Mr Leon Perera – support the repeal, and two – Mr Gerald Giam and Mr Dennis Tan – have voiced their opposition to it. Politicians should not be seen siding with particular groups on issues of great social division and contending values, he said.
She recognised that some fundamental liberties in the Constitution have been qualified, but said these tend to be “scoped very tightly and justified on the grounds of national emergencies, security, public order and public health”.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Singapore Latest News, Singapore Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Repealing 377A does not signal state’s hostility towards the family unit or religious freedom: Pritam SinghThe Leader of the Opposition also lifted the party whip for Workers' Party MPs on this debate. Let's talk it straight. Repealing 377A will degenerate and undermine the family unit and cohesion. Don't pretend. Over time when it ever becomes normalised here, we would grieve over the irreversible situation. It is not the end but only the beginning.
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »
WP MPs differ in debate on Section 377A repeal, after Pritam Singh lifts party whip on 'matter of deep religious belief, conscience'SINGAPORE — Workers' Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh allowed his Members of Parliament (MPs) to express their different views during a debate on the repeal of Section 377A on Monday (Nov 28) by lifting the party whip. He reiterated that WP does not have a consensus view on the matter. So PAP framed this purely from legal point of view while WP put it as religious & belief and conscience. Interesting.
Source: TODAYonline - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
WP lifts whip on S377A, explains why it did not openly support repealMr Pritam Singh said politicians should not be seen as siding with particular groups on issues of great social division and contending values. Read more at straitstimes.com. WP is 🐓 🙄 Ms Sylvia Lim's point of NOT precluding the judiciary in deciding on matters of constitutionality is valid and pressing. There is the tyranny of the majority where the majority is NOT always right. What is necessary and essential is to get what's right, and practical, practicable
Source: straits_times - 🏆 5. / 69 Read more »
Repealing S377A the right step for Govt, Parliament: MinistersRepealing the longstanding law criminalising gay sex is the responsible thing for the Government and Parliament to do, two ministers said on Monday. There is a real risk that the courts could strike down Section 377A of the Penal Code with an impact on marriage and...
Source: thenewpaper - 🏆 7. / 63 Read more »
Singapore MPs to 'tread careful line' as debate begins on gay sex law repealSingapore lawmakers will on Monday (Nov 28) debate two bills that seek to repeal a colonial-era law criminalising sex between men while preserving the city state's status quo position on marriage. Analysts say parliamentarians across the political spectrum are set to air potential concerns and flesh out key points after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong first announced plans for the...
Source: asiaonecom - 🏆 10. / 59 Read more »