NOW Telecom loses Supreme Court case

  • 📰 rapplerdotcom
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 32 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 86%

Philippines Headlines News

Philippines Latest News,Philippines Headlines

NOW Telecom once sued the NTC over the fees it set in the bidding process, but the Supreme Court says the guidelines 'were proper' to ensure that companies were financially and technically capable

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

MANILA, Philippines – It’s the end of the road for NOW Telecom, a company that once sought to become the Philippines’ third major telco player, after the Supreme Court junked its case against the National Telecommunications Commission . Associate Justice Rodil Zalameda wrote the decision, with the concurrence of Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo, and associate justices Ramon Paul Hernando, Ricardo Rosario and Jose Midas Marquez of the Court’s 1st Division., NOW Telecom filed a case against NTC with the Manila Regional Trial Court to challenge the multi-billion-peso fees that the agency required for interested bidders.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 4. in PH

Philippines Latest News, Philippines Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Grants Protective Writs to Abducted Environmental ActivistsThe Supreme Court (SC) granted the protective writs filed by young environmental activists allegedly abducted by the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) last year. The SC magistrates moved to grant the writs of amparo and habeas data petitions filed by the activists. A writ of amparo is a legal remedy, usually a protection order in the form of a restraining order.
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court Issues Guidelines on Determining Liability of Minors in CrimesThe Supreme Court issues guidelines on determining the liability of minors in crimes, specifically focusing on discernment of perpetrators. The guidelines aim to determine a minor's capacity to understand right and wrong and the consequences of their actions.
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court finds PAO chief Persida Acosta guilty of indirect contemptSupreme Court (SC) justices unanimously found Public Attorney’s Office (PAO) chief Persida Acosta guilty of indirect contempt for violating section 3(d), rule 71, of the Rules of Court, and of grossly undignified conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Acosta was ordered to pay P30,000 for the indirect contempt, and P150,000 for grossly undignified conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court fines driver for road rage incidentThe Supreme Court has directed a driver to pay a fine of P35,000 for an incident of road rage. The driver, Gerardo Manganaan, was found guilty of vulgar and unbecoming conduct and simple misconduct for repeatedly trying to cut through a convoy of the National Defense College of the Philippines.
Source: gmanews - 🏆 11. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court dismisses judge in Oriental Mindoro for soliciting bribesThe Supreme Court (SC) dismissed a judge in Oriental Mindoro who solicited bribes from lawyers, litigants, and elective officials in exchange for favorable actions. The court found Judge Edralin Reyes guilty of gross misconduct and ordered his dismissal from service.
Source: TheManilaTimes - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »

US Supreme Court Reverses Decision to Exclude Trump from Colorado's Republican Primary BallotUS Supreme Court justices unanimously reverse a decision by Colorado's top court to kick Trump off the state's Republican primary ballot, overturning a judicial decision that had excluded him from Colorado’s ballot under a constitutional provision involving insurrection for inciting and supporting the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack.
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »