Is SC covering up for Azam Baki, asks Guan Eng | The Malaysian Insight

Is SC covering up for Azam Baki, asks Guan Eng

Azam Baki, Lim Guan Eng

19/1/2022 8:55:00 AM

Is SC covering up for Azam Baki , asks Guan Eng

Regulatory body risks loss of investor confidence with 'dishonest and irresponsible statement' about MACC chief, says DAP leader.

Copy URLDAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng wants to know if the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, in return for the Securities Commission’s ‘inconclusive’ verdict on its chief, will soon release a statement exonerating the regulatory body’s senior officers that are under investigation. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, January 19, 2022.

THE Securities Commission must declare whether it is covering up for MACC chief Azam Baki in coming up with an inconclusive decision on its inquiry into his conduct, Lim Guan Eng said today.The DAP leader was commenting on the SC’s statement yesterday that the regulator was unable to determine whether Azam had breached section 25(4) of the Securities Industry (Central Depositories) Act 1991 in allowing his brother Nasir to use his trading account.

Read more: The Malaysian Insight »

LGE should keep quiet as he's considered as court cluster No la...SC just caved in to Macc as they said they would look into complaints against SC directors etc SC is not covering up Azam Baki But Tommy Thomas is covering up for YOU!

SC selesai siasat Azam Baki, tiada pelanggaran undang-undang | The Malaysian InsightSC hari ini memaklumkan ia sudah selesai menyiasat kes Azam mengikut Seksyen 25(4) Akta Perindustrian Sekuriti (Depositori Pusat) 1991 (SICDA). Tahniah. You lepaskan saya..saya lepaskan awak. jadi lawak 🤣

SC unable to conclusively establish if Azam Baki breached trading regulationsPETALING JAYA: Securities Commission (SC) says unable to conclusively establish that Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki breached section 25(4) of the Securities Industry (Central Depositories) Act 1991 (SICDA). 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡 ASAbdull1 Of course not. Its his own acc and he traded himself. That is not wrong unless there's evidance that his brother really used his account (if you know what I meant)😉So SC is passing the batton to someone else. SecComMY officials themselves afraid to be investigated by SPRMMalaysia ?

SC gagal bukti pelanggaran akta dalam isu saham Azam Baki | Harian MetroKuala Lumpur: Suruhanjaya Sekuriti Malaysia (SC) tidak dapat membuktikan wujud pelanggaran pemilikan saham menerusi akaun dagangan Ketua Pesuruhjaya Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) Tan Sri Azam Baki . Aku dah agak dah kayangan mesti terlepas

SC findings in Azam Baki inquiry must be made public, observers say | The Malaysian InsightThey say regulator should be transparent amid public suspicion of pressure from MACC to conclude case. ALHAMDULILLAH, FILE DAH BOLEH TUTUP DAH, ALLAH LINDUNGI AZAM BAKI DARI FITNAH, SUBHANALLAH, ALHAMDULILLAH, ALLAHUAKBAR, Yes. I believed that SC has caved in.... made public ? ... 😄

SC perlu dedahkan hasil siasatan kes Azam Baki kepada awam, kata pemerhati | The Malaysian InsightTiada rumusan muktamad oleh SC boleh menimbulkan tanggapan ia berdepan tekanan SPRM dan menjejaskan keyakinan pelabur.

DAP selar SC, bagaimana Azam Baki lepas tuduhan SICDA?'Seksyen 25(4) SICDA kini menjadi seperti harimau tidak bertaring dan tidak berguna lagi.' Hoi 🐖🐖🐖 limguaneng KES bungalow kamu bebas.apa macam? dapperak sembanglaaa apekk Bagaimana Tommy Thomas boleh tutup kes kamu dengan Tanpa apa2 alasan yang kukuh? Jangan nak cerita pasal kes orang. Kes rasuah awak pon masih berjalan. Rumah awak di Sg Buloh menanti awak datang.