Supreme Court upholds genetic non-discrimination law

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 61 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 92%

Canada Headlines News

Canada Latest News,Canada Headlines

Justices split but majority decision rejects Quebec's claim the law transgresses on provincial jurisdictions

Parliament has the authority to criminalize mandatory genetic testing and the forced disclosure of voluntary genetic test results, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.

Quebec argued that the real subject of the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act was the regulation of genetic information for insurers and employers. It had asked the Quebec Court of Appeal to give an advisory opinion on the law’s constitutionality, and in 2018 the appeal court decided by a 5-0 count that the law was not within federal authority.

“Parliament is entitled to use its criminal law power to respond to a reasoned apprehension of harm, including a threat to public health,” Justice Andromache Karakatsanis wrote for the larger group, which also included Justice Rosalie Abella and Justice Sheilah Martin. Also unusual, the attorney-general of Canada , opposed the law in the Quebec Court of Appeal, leaving a federal law without its foremost defender. The Quebec appeal court, and later the Supreme Court, appointed Montreal lawyer Douglas Mitchell as a friend of the court to argue in support of the law.

Mr. Oliphant said in an interview Friday that “so much pressure was put on me not to do this.” He declined to say from whom, other than “a variety of sources.” He praised Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for allowing Liberal MPs to vote their conscience on a private member’s bill.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in CA

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trump can't deny prosecutors access to his financial records, U.S. Supreme Court rulesUnlike other recent presidents, Trump has refused to release his tax returns and other documents that could provide details on his wealth Lol... that choice of pic So then no other American politician can either.. TRUMP IS FAKE NEWS
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rules against Trump bid to conceal financial records from prosecutorTrump has refused to release his tax returns and other documents that could provide details on his wealth and the activities of Trump Organization Oh Boy ! The devil is in the details . Look a little deeper . ' The president 'may raise further arguments as appropriate,' in lower courts in an effort to keep Vance from obtaining his documents, Roberts wrote. ' FakeNews
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Supreme Court to rule on constitutionality of genetic discrimination lawThe Supreme Court of Canada is slated to rule Friday morning on the constitutionality of a federal law that forbids companies from making people undergo genetic testing before buying insurance or other services. Oh, oh wait, stfu
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Supreme Court to rule on constitutionality of genetic discrimination lawThe Genetic Non-Discrimination Act outlaws the practice of requiring the disclosure of existing genetic test results as a condition for obtaining such services or entering into a contract We have the right to associate and work for whomever we please. The result of any such law would be to infringe that right. Why, are they smelling comeuppance? So, we'll let genetically unfit person live and survive😒.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Genetic non-discrimination law is constitutional, Supreme Court saysThe Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed the constitutionality of a federal law that forbids companies from making people undergo genetic testing before buying insurance or other services. Complex issue, but I think this is good news. Sunnydays180 I will have to research why Jody Wilson-Raybould, then minister of justice opposed this law. It’s a complicated issue but from my viewpoint it’s the right thing to do, why should you be penalized for knowing your genetics. So insurance rates will go up for everyone then since the insurance companies can't tell who has an identifiable disorder and who doesn't? They will have to distribute the unknown risk.
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »