PM's national security adviser suggested Emergencies Act's definition of a security threat should change
The prime minister’s security and intelligence adviser says that the definition of a "national security threat" under the terms of the Emergencies Act should be changed to better reflect the times.
Change the law to suit the needs of political agenda? Sounds like Jody Thomas needs walking papers.
'...should be reconsidered to better reflect how badly we exaggerated and abused the Act.' Corrected it for you.
so Canada has on real law then? Make it up as we go along and as we want it to be is acceptable in Canada?
Of course, the times demand draconian measures of course and an end to democracy to make the rules fit. Right? 🙄
I’d call that an admission of guilt, and that the criterion wasn’t met.
How about NO? Embarrassment to Trudeau should not ever be a reason for the EA. The law is clear. They broke the law. Time for accountability.
Seems that if the definition doesn't work then they just change the definition so it works for their agenda, we were so close to a recession, luckily they moved the bar just in time.
So she took it upon herself ?
The times ? You mean to better reflect the ideology of sunny ways .
So 'we should rework the rule because we didn't follow it' after the fact?
Not being 'a lawyer ... no intelligence gathering experience'; Despite the CSIS/OPP IB reports; Since 'There is no true legislative definition of 'national security''; Why did the NSIA state 'There are other definitions of threats'? +.. which are not 'very narrow and outdated'?
It is the same 'totality of the circumstances' that led to the invocation of the EA (according to the NSIA) that should also apply to the CSIS & OPP IB reports, evidence of no security threat, isn't it?
Cbc will be a thing of the past in a couple of years and we won't have to try to bend our minds around their newspeak. I just pretend they don't exist.
It's not a lie if you believe it. Haha
I’m so looking forward to the day where you guys get defunded completely and stop propagating your lies and twisting your stories you are the Mcmedia presstitoot‼️ and the definition is just fine. Just leave it alone.
Changing the rules as they go. True Liberal bull 💩
No. Absolutely not. You may not alter the definition to suit your communist agenda.
Translation.... there was no threat and it didn't approach the definition but I think we should change the definition to include my feelings. These people better end up unemployed, at the very least. If nothing happens I'm guessing part 2 will be coming.
So you make up a definition to suit your agenda. This is scary
you are a threat to our national and international security and are funded by a fascist, communist state 'Canadian' liberal-NDP government.
It should include Justin's hurt feelings for sure.
Lol.. making up new rules on the fly with no debate..... communist
How convenient. I'm sure your activist station is all in favor?
Wants to change the rules to cover up for the fact they broke the law by invoking the act. Typical Liberal, the only reason we broke the law is because the law was wrong. Charge her
Better reflect the times or the 'need' ?
Then she should just write to her MP and suggest that.
So more govt propaganda from the CBC I have no trust in anything the CBC *reports*. No wonder they need govt funding to operate
She should be removed from her position immediately.
Typical liberal if your caught then lets change the meaning to save our asses
liberalismisamentaldisease TrudeauDestroyingCanada TrudeauIsTheNewHitler TrudeauMustGo TrudeauCorruption nevervoteliberalagain
Yep, change the rules to right a wrong... Typical
She believes a 'threat to security' should be redefined as a 'threat to the Liberal Party'!
Now that they have gotten away with using this Act it will be that much easier to use it again any time someone doesn’t agree with them. This sets a dangerous precedent for government control over the people
StepDownTrudeau
It's funny. The convoy organizers had better intelligence with the policing agencies leaking information to them. The government relying on their own bought MSM and twitter for their intelligence is just sad.
TOTALITARIANISM... Once a psychopath is in power, he can do whatever he wants. The law only protects him. The only law he creates, there is no law. This is the perverted sick democracy of Justin Trudeau. Wake up Canada. This is a fascism.
Wake up Canada, Turd created a totalitarian fascist government
Liberalfascist regime...
So in other words, change the definition to fit liberal idealism, get your head out of your ass. Tired of everything being liberalized (dumbed down, change meaning) to fit your Agenda that does nothing but sell put Canada
Let's retroactively change the laws so that our prior actions are legal. -Liberals
I think it is, at the very least, a call on all fronts to reexamine Pierre Trudeau's BS constitution, that was just trampled on, by his ef-Trudeau, son. The provinces would be better off, Canadians would be better off, .. Quebec, maybe not so much.
Love to see less and less justifications for evoking the EA.
The EA inquiry is not about rewriting the EA! Weak BS from government bureaucrats trying to deceive and deflect! And frankly make themselves look the fools they are!
Lol!
She comes across as so non partisan!
So what your saying is our govt thinks they should get more dictatorial powers 😒 the only thing they are gunna get is a civil war and theres too many of us and not enough that will stand with our govt so BACK OFF. The people have the power not the govt. Dont make us use it.
Wrong.
What? Can we not count on anything sane to be in place by the time the Liberals are roundly tossed from office?
Hurt feeling from tweets? No, not a good idea
I think Canada would be better to Reconsider Jody Thomas in her Role as National Security Advisor. Not suitably trained or knowledgeable in regards to safety and chooses Not to Listen to those that are.
Reflect the times... Tyranny is timeless....
Orwellian.
You mean justify Trudeau's actions. CBC = Canada Brainwashing Corporation
Simple. Just have Marco Mendocino backdate a change to the definition and legislate it last year.
So now they need to change yet another words definition to suit their spin on things. I don’t think that’s a good idea nor should be permitted
This government is embarrassing
That might be fair, but it still takes proper democratic process! By definition of the existing terms, invoking the EA in Feb was illegal.
Didn't Hitler do the same thing.
Change the definition so it works for them? It’s laughable. It’s corrupt.
Once again we see the radical left trying to adjust the rules to fit their agenda. They are a true threat to democracy, freedom and all of Canada
like this, I drive a big truck
Wake up Canada
Trudeau permitting China’s abuse of our elections is a real and serious attack on Canada’s security, representing a deliberate premeditated abuse of power. It’s traitorous, in fact. The convoy, in comparison, was a fully legal protest.
They haven't even got through the inquiry and here is the Trudeau government calling for looser controls on using the E Act. I can almost smell the bananas. TrudeauCorruption TrudeauMustGo
All I see are swatt horses trampling peaceful protesters.
We need change definition ... That's their excuse. Dictatorship would be proud
If you don’t respect the laws of the land you have no place in high office.
Class action lawsuit coming soon.
Defund the CBC. The CBC is a propaganda tool bought and paid for by future generations of Canadians with washed brains.
This is very dangerous because what she is saying is if you talk out against what people in the govt are doing, YOU are a terrorist, the Canada loving person
Right. We need a bunch of new definitions so it fits the narrative. Isn't that what fascist dictatorships do? Everything Hitler did in Germany was legal. They put the laws in place then enforced them 🤔
I bet she does. CSIS wasn't worried. Nor the RCMP. But Thomas (Bachelor of Commerce, University of Calgary, Bachelor of Arts, Carleton University) was. I went to RMC to do a Master's in 1992. I should run Social Services. Perhaps Human Resources. Perhaps CBC.
Right, just change the definition to suit the narrative Orwell1984
So CBC, are you agreeing with Jody Thomas
Just incredible. The situation didn’t come close to meeting the definition, so the liberals want to change the definition. Incredible. For what should be the hardest law to enact in Canada. Nobody seems upset about this…. Simply unbelievable.
so basically the libs will change it so that it can be used to stifle political dissent. in this case we just wanted our charter rights back but who knew its a threat to canada! this hellhole is not heading down a good road
You mean to include peaceful protests if/when it's a Liberal government they're protesting against. People like you are exactly why this country's founders created a constitution.
When you break the rules, just retroactively change those rules, then no rules were ever broken! It’s a very progressive solution
Liberal funded propaganda
I want the government to be a little bit afraid of the people.
Translation: she wants to change it to reflect her political goals.
To what? Something that covers those national security threat block parties and BBQ'S? Everyone knows the three biggest threats to our national security.
Clearly her opinion has no backing from current law and legislation. It was a completely useless inquiry with her on the stand.
Super. When we get to a new evidence based definition of 'threat to security' in the future - and it's written into law - that might even reflect the definition they pulled out of a hat in February.
Guess what. They're all corrupt and everyone goes down with the ship if this goes south. They will fight it to the end.
So no protests allowed! (Except those sanctioned by the regime). Times they are a’ changing
'Whenever we G-D well feel like it.' doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
HONK HONK!!!
So change the rules for a tyrant. No thanks. Hurt feelings are not enough to invoke the EA
Ah yes, change the definition to make sure you’re right…nothing to see here…
Which is just code for 'Any movement that happens to disagree with how we want the nation to run'
But that doesn't change that fact that they were operating under the current definition when they broke the law.
No. And until they are, you acted illegally and should be in jail.
This article is great. All it says is that Thomas was looking for an excuse, looking for definitions of what constitutes a national threat, almost looking everywhere to no avail. If you can’t find ANY evidence, there’s literally no reason to use the EA.
Typical liberal move, when you start losing the argument, invent new meaningless words or change the definition of the old ones. We cannot cede the linguistic territory to detestable ideologues.
Changing the definition solves the problem, case closed 👍
and what are the times? exactly?
No.
Liberals always changing and twisting definitions.
Just like they did with inflation, woman and vaccine... These left extremists need to go
It's not her job to decide what she thinks the definition should be. Trying to change the definition to suit their own needs does not surprise me. Liberals have no shame!
Shocker. These criminals that are destroying society have been redefining terms and protocols to suit their agenda since just before the beginning of this “pandemic”. Incidentally,pandemic is another word they have redefined in order to declare an “Emergency”. Not fooling anyone.
As far as Torontonians are concerned, the drama teacher can take away our rights
The serious threat to Canada is Trudy and his paid off lying machine.
What a useless statement
🤣🤣🤣. Bullshit, jody wants to change it to mean whatever they need to avoid being held accountable for government over reach
Yes, we need to prtotect the government which is more corrupt than ever before because people are starting to talk via this thing called the internet.
That is true, that is what Jody Thomas said. Would I want her to have any authority to change our laws, no. That is not her job.
In Trudeaus Canada The threat to Canadian security should include “Mean tweets” You can’t make this 💩 up🤪 emergencyactinquiry EmergenciesAct cdnpolitics TrudeauIsTheNewHitler
Jody Thomas was the DM DND whom protected JustinTrudeau during the Military Sexual misconduct This Loyalty got her promoted to her current position As the NSA to the PM; Her Threat Risk Assessment is based on OSINT vice CSIS or any other Intelligence Assessments
So they were not justified in using EA. Therefore they should be put in jail. Their justification is mean tweets. Insanity
Ya, wouldn't Trudeau love to water down those targets!! Then he can use anytime he wants!! I hope the targets are tougher not weaker!
In other words, to make her boss look less like a tyrant.
There’s a threat alright, the Federal government
Oh really? Does she mean it should fit her narrative? Does she not know her history? 🤯 The EA is sufficient. Plunging Canada in unjustified ideology is not.
Ie. She’s a communist
…And that would be protests that the government dosent like
Based on Trudeau’s recent shaming by the head of the most powerful country on the globe, we agree the definition of a “threat to Canadian security” needs to clearly define who Trudeau is allowed to talk to. He should be limited to leaders of 3rd world countries only.
Time to start throwing these corrupt politicians in jail. Disgusting behavior
Listen propaganda machine. Facts don't care about your feelings. What are we next thought police?
So she want's to re-arange legistation to render the use of EA justified? Hmm.. that is a tad unnerving. Thank goodness she only a bureaucrat.
At the end of day, all that matters in a free society... (we're still free right?) ...is the CONSENT of the governed. And you can be sure that the 338 jackals in Ottawa do NOT have it!
Right. So in other words rather than face the fact they wrongly invoked the emergencies act - change the emergencies act to support their actions. Gee nobody will figure that out… The liberals are just so sly.
“reconsidered to reflect better on our actions.” What she meant.
Translation: I screwed up.
Regardless of weather she thinks it needs changes is irrelevant at the moment. Changes would require due democratic process. You can’t just change the rules to suit your wants. To me her statement is an admission that the current legal criteria was not met.
So she didn’t follow the act
Does the National Security Advisor run the show-in Canada?
They are reaching so hard...
You want to change the definition to keep people under your thumb and to fall in line. We are not sheep, we are not stupid. So stop acting like we are, you fn hypocrites.
So they didn’t meet the threshold, so not they want to change it to justify what they did? And you don’t see a problem with this?
Riiiiiight. Just change the definition of national security threats to casually include your political rivals, like you did with “women.”
😂😂😂
Jody Thomas should find a different job.
No and stop trying to redefine everything to fit your leftist agenda. Just trying to move the goalposts now that it's abundantly clear the Emergencies Act was not necessary.
I miss the version of Canada that didn’t look like this photo, that didn’t employ government storm troopers to enforce the governments body snatching jab mandate policies.
Yes, it should be changed such that if protests are against a Liberal government the nuclear option should be used.
So in other words let’s rewrite the emergencies act to match what the liberals did being as they did not meet the requirements of the act?
Election interference is a threat to national security but liberals are not concerned with that...
Change the words to let us become a tyranny!
When Liberals are unhappy is what she means by Times.
Ya just change the laws to accommodate Liberals crimes against Canada. Ya great idea.
Pathetic
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Change the definition of vaccine, change the definition of inflation, change the poverty level, change the definition of a woman... there is no end to liberal clown world. Just reinvent reality.
They want to remove all barriers to doing what they damn well please. It’s about staying in power. That’s the bottom line for Liberals. Always been that way.
You horrible liars. This is exactly the problem. You support the liars and cheats. Cannot wait till con’s take over. You will be gone.
Oh, suddenly meeting the requirement of the CSIS Act is no longer valid because it doesn't suit Justin Trudeau?
Ya because words on the internet are worse than bullets. What a crock.
So trudeau was correct when he said he admires dictatorships.
Yeah they sure as heck need that now, don’t they? Criminals. I’m sure they’ll sidestep this catastrophe somehow, usher in some retroactive ‘modification’.
She is not qualified for her position
Defund CBC and CTV for lying about Canadians
Riiiight. Nasty tweets threaten EVERY COUNTRY......Everyone knows that ‼
This is the textbook definition of bending the law to serve your own ulterior agenda. Government in Canada getting really good at it. Will the Canadian people tolerate this?
Yeah, because she's definitely the one to decide that...🙈
In other words, the Freedom Convoy did NOT meet the definition - and it was not a threat!
*An unelected bureaucrat wants to change policy set by an elected government to make the illegal use of the EA legal. Fixed the headline for you.
Actually, Jody should be changed to better reflect the times.
Anything but admit Trudeau failed on every level during the protest.
Meaning that if you don't agree with the regime, the regime will crush you with force and freeze your bank accounts? This is some China level BS
Retroactively change it? Cover your assets at all and any costs!
You know you're full of sh1t when you need to start redefining things to justify your over reaction. It the good ol days journalists would be heavily criticising this kind of talk instead of propagating it.
You know you're full of sh1t when you need to start redefining things to justify your over reaction. It the good ol days journalists would be heavily criticising this kind of talk instead of propagating it.
There is not now nor has there ever been any threat whatsoever to Canada’s security or anyone’s security for that matter from the freedom convoy. Let’s call it what it is Trudeau wanting to make a splash and take control. Nothing more nothing less
So what… he wants it to be if you whine loudly enough… It’s considered a threat?
So change the definition of threat based on which party is in power….maybe the department of peace could help with that
So a redefined 'threat to Canada' would now mean that citizens who don't agree with Elite Propaganda no longer have a place in our democracy? Is that the new definition of 'threat'? And bouncy castles? FreedomConvoy TrudeauMustGo
Criminalizing peaceful protest & freedom of speech, especially in the face of a flurry of unprecedented civil rights violations, has nothing to do with changing times. It has everything to do with a Liberal gov & progressive media establishment eager to silence & censor dissent.
Oh yeah...change the definition to fit the crime...wooooow Our Gov't is so woke 🥴
paparies in the square!
A step closer to Nazi Canada
Nothing should be reconsidered to better reflect the times because our times are an aberration with lunatics running the asylum…
OMFG 🤣🙄
FireThomas DefundCBC That would be the best way to deal with future threats to the security of Canada and uphold the constitutional rights of Canadian citizens. PierrePoilievre4PM TrudeauNationalDisgrace POECommission
Sounds like a bunch of incompetent Keystone Cops were running the show in Ottawa.
She also said she made up her own definition and went with that in the meantime. After stressing multiple times that she was not a lawyer.
Well that’s terrifying
If current definitions don’t support your narrative, the solution is simple - change the meaning of words. 🥴
How about Liberals simply start listening to Canadians and putting them first? Then they don't have to keep changing definitions to stay ahead of the game 🤷🏻♂️
Changing definitions to suit their narrative once again. Kind of like how the US changed the definition of vaccine haha. Ridiculous and dangerous.
What dose that even mean? I don't want libs reinterpreting any type of law, based around their worldview. A worldview that thinks micro-aggression should be responded to with invoking the emergency act.
Could the cbc look into the possible invoking of the emergencies act in 2020 when the lockdowns were first introduced.
Liberals are corrupt and so is the National Security Advisor Jody Thomas
Ahaha or the agenda? Lol tell me you have a dictator mindset without saying it lol.
She should be fired immediately
My God, that woman is a danger to Canadians
And this so-called NSA Jody Thomas said that there was a flag on a wrecking ball. Does this look like a wrecking ball How can she even be taken seriously after saying that?🤡🤡
Should it include hot tubs and bouncy castles?
The Emergencies Act is not written in pencil 🙄
CBC feeds garbage new and lies correct me if I'm wrong
And how would she know with a Bachelor of Arts from Carleton? What a bunch of clowns you are.
Maybe but not retroactive and not without an Act of Parliament and the required level of Provincial support, none of which trudeau had!
Sean97811918 In other word we played with words and imagine a broader definition to make it seem like we legally invoked the EA… typical lying politicians…
Insane corrupt people in charge. EA is WarMeasuresAct. Don’t manipulate it for political gain. Now they have us on brink of WW3, supporting Ukrainian Nazi Azov & leaders/MSM say nothing? You want numpties to lead us in WW3? Canada cdnpoli CPC_HQ BCConservative1 bcliberals
Say that to the 600 million trudeau is sending you , you shameless hacks!
She would have been a great even perfect right hand man for hitler , stalin , mao , no wonder turdoe has her
Moving the Goalposts 101
'We want to be able to invoke the act more easily, in the event the citizenry have opinions and thought of their own.'
Jody is correct - they should ABSOLUTELY be reconsidered to better reflect the times, so that the government can never overstep and use this act on peaceful protesters again. Know what else we should reconsider? CBC's funding. DefundCBC
Too late for that. Accountability now.
WTF.
But she didn't have the power or authority to unilaterally reconsider it all by herself in order to justify the invocation of the EA in February, against all advice from Intelligence. It is SO beyond wrong, and she needs to be held legally accountable. I hope sooner than later.
No it shouldn’t…. The definition is fine! liberals don’t have to change everything to fit their narrative!
We need to stop changing definitions for unlawful and unreasonable reasons. If it didn’t meet the requirement, it didn’t meet the requirement. End of story.
😂😂😂
Nazi Tyrant propagandists running the CBC can lick balls
Anyone that gets in my way. Is that better?
You mean to better reflect justin's understanding of a national threat.
*FIXED* National Security Advisor Judy Thomas says the definition of a 'threat to security of Canada' should be able to handle angry citizens to keep propagating TrudeauTyranny . 'Socialism is the way of life' -Paid Canadian Schills
“I dont like the laws as they are written so i’d just like to interpret them differently so i can justify trampling little old ladies with horses”.
Uh huh…
If the law doesn’t fit the government’s wrong doings change the law! This country is a disgrace.
The only change needed is for gov't officials to be thrown in jail for mandatory min sentences when they break laws, or try to change laws after they break them. Is this really to much to ask for?
The Government INVENTED A New Justification For Invoking Emergencies Act Based On Their ‘Feelings’ A depth of dishonesty, deception, and desperation to use authoritarian state power that should disgust the Canadian People.
Because social media is now taken as factual intelligence. Future: How can we make the EA more sustainable for inept government and law enforcement's inability to do their jobs.
Yes because bad words 🤣
Isn't it interesting that the Truedolt government is constantly changing definitions of just about every subject to suit their globalist ambitions? There's a reason it's called a 'new world order'
Sounds like Jody Thomas wants Canada to become China.
Lmfao 🤣 you know the hearings aren’t going well for the liberals when they want to move goalposts. This makes me happy 🤣 TrudeauIsTheNewHitler
Fear of what could happen is not in the EA definition, next week we’ll hear more at the POEC the Can gov went rogue without following laws.
Akin to changing the definition of a vaccine to better reflect the sales pitch of the forced jab?
Change the rules to make it fit the narrative.
Liberal Propaganda
Oh that's clear.
She lied in testimony. Here is her briefing from the convoy time,
Defund the CBC.
Um she should recommend that Junior closes his Twitter acc if words are so hurtful to the little Vichy PM 🤣
So the current definition doesn't fit the excessive use of the EA, so the Liberal strategy is to now change the definition? 🤦♂️Anyone actually surprised by this?
Let me guess. They want to change it to include lots of trucks honking their horns and people partying?
No 👎
The changed the anthem and said f you to soldiers now what to dictate the charter. Wake up people these are communist
Lol....you gonna push to redefine yet another word to fit your narrative? Pathetic
Who wears it better
You can't keep changing the crew just because the ship is going down..or change the constitution because it doesn't suit your agenda. It sounds like Turdeau's Liberals are getting desperate..
So CSIS' definition isn't good enough for her? When does social media misinformation become fact? When a Liberal deems it so apparently. LeftyHysteria EmergenciesAct
“Ya let’s change the definition so we don’t get in trouble” -liberals
Zero threat from those protesters
this person was a Coastguard Commissioner and a high level bureaucrat ...got big NSA job on Jan 11...she is not even qualified for job ..who did social media work for her Navigator? What about our compromised elected officials ..is that not a big deal to her?
It interesting that the Liberals are so short sighted, they change the rule for this issue, exonerate themselves, then what happens when the Conservatives get in and run rampant? They will have no right to complain or look like hypocrites.
Orrr here me out, instead of changing the definition how about we just fire the national security advisor.
Hmmm... Maybe next time? This time we're going to apply the law as it is - not as a hand-picked Trudeau lackey wishes it to be.
To better reflect the time? So they can do whatever they want, whenever they want…. These people are so power hungry.
Yet CSIS, RCMP and all the pice forces said there was no national security threat. A hot tub and bouncy castles are not a security threat
you mean now that people are so weak that imagining something hurts their feelings requires the renamed war measures act to be implemented.
“PM’s National Security Advisor Admits That Events Did Not Represent A Security Threat As Defined By Law” (fixed your headline for you).
How 'bout no
Democracy = at risk when those in power unilaterally redefine “threat” on the fly. Stalin did it, Hitler, Mao, et al. Same when advisors to those in power fall into politically correct line by conveniently basing it on what they “feel.”🇨🇦top public servants = on dangerous ground!
Oh, of course. Let me guess: a threat to the security of Canada should be redefined to 'things that annoy the Liberal Party.'
This is some next level Chinese communist shit.
The reason the definition is written that was is that the EA is an extreme response. This used to be referred to as the War Measures Act. Coincidentally only utilized by Trudeau's father. You certainly don't want to make that a go to. 🙄
Let’s change the definition of every word to suit our narrative. What a joke! When you can’t win fairly, cheat!
So now you gonna use the EA on church burnings, railroad blockades and anything to do with Antifa/BLM riots? Just curious.
Leftists love to change language to suit their ideology & agenda. Bottom line: Conditions surrounding FC did NOT meet the definition. Like children pulling a tantrum cuz the teacher took their toy away. Face reality.
Just like when communism failed in USSR, China and North Korea, they changed the definition of communism and rebranded all these failures as xxxism
She needs to be fired. Sounds like her incompetence is a threat to Canada
Changing definitions to suit your agenda has became so predictable.
Weak Woke Leaders bring Hard Times
So Thomas proposes the EA be amended to suit gov’t narrative. Kinda like how the left rewrites history. Can somebody stop “these” ppl?
In other words, no the convoy did not meet the definition under the law, and, feeling frustrated, she suggested to just use it anyway, and change the law later. Must be nice to change the rules of the game when you feel like you're losing.
Cbc funding should also be 'reconsidered'
So basically the covid strategy: Just change the definitions of words that have had decades of agreed upon meaning to retroactively justify illegal policy.
In other words, it should be vague like climate change and based on feelings and speculations.
In other words, the government wants to make it easier for them to suspend our civil liberties.
Remember, social media and the CBC is her true source of disinformation?
So admitting that it should not have been enacted? It needs to be reconsidered but we enact it anyway and see what shit hits the fan?
Defund Jody Thomas 🤨
The fact remains that there is a definition and what happened during the freedom convoy didn't come close to meeting the threshold to invoke the EA. The government is so desperate they want to change the definition to fit the situation. Think about that.
So... she wants it to be redefined so she doesn't look like a panic-stricken pearl-clutching know nothing for her role in the EA? Everyone needs to see how grossly incompetent and underqualified she was for her job, and whoever appointed her needs to explain why they did
so arrogant. so unqualified. this elite little group just does what it wants. JustinTrudeau cafreeland most should be fired
Lol. Bull cookies. So in other words make it legal to put on the EA for everything.
New rules to suit and give them cover for how they did things in the past.🙄. We cannot call that good government, but one that continues to ignore ethics, good governance, openness and transparency as promised. The LiberalHypocrisy continues to bend rules to suit their mood
so its like the definition of inflation or the definition of vaccines...they need to change it to fit the narative!!!
The 'totality'? I think she worded 'totalitarian' wrong
Despicable and flagrant attempt to avoid consequences for an egregious overreach of power.
Definitely need a hot tub clause
Changes so that it fits their stupid narrative!!? 🙄Focus on the plank in your own eyes before trying to take the toothpick out of another's eye!
better reflect the times Better reflect politicians whims.
DefundCBC
CUPE strike? Hear hear
Weak
They're trying to change the definition retroactively. They adapt reality by changing definitions. We need a Liberals dictionary. They've already redefined independent, ethics, investment and infrastructure
I listened to the interrogation. What I got out of it? Jody Thomas is not qualified to be the pm’s national security advisor, she is extremely biased and arrogant. She exaggerated the events of the convoy. An evil woman. Has a degree in commerce and an arts degree, not security
Reflect the times. So you mean corrupt PMO who shut down protests they don’t like to save their political asses.
So because she cannot cite any actual “threat to security” she wants to change the definition to mean imagined threats to security such as a bunch of people mad on social media?🤷🏻♂️ If it wasn’t so disastrous to who we are as Canadians, this clown show would be hilarious.
Lmao so feeling embarrassed should be a threat to security now. Pathetic
As we're on the heels of the great reset and knowing the world economic Forum plans on having hundreds of millions of people die, I think maybe that's what the national security advisor is suggesting about the emergencies act. Klaus Schwab said it's going to get very bad!
yup, lets have half a dozen definitions so we will always have one that will fit any situation
Tacit admission that the current definition didn’t meet the threshold.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: natnewswatch - 🏆 58. / 59 Read more »
Source: natnewswatch - 🏆 58. / 59 Read more »
Source: calgarysun - 🏆 63. / 52 Read more »
Source: TorontoStar - 🏆 60. / 55 Read more »
Source: CP24 - 🏆 30. / 67 Read more »
Source: GlobalNational - 🏆 81. / 51 Read more »