A tribunal has imposed sanctions on Adelaide veterinary surgeon Marcus Wei Sheng Tan for acting inappropriately with animals.An Adelaide veterinary surgeon has been fined and reprimanded for a series of inappropriate acts involving animals – but has not been banned from practising.Dr Marcus Wei Sheng Tan will instead be allowed to practice with "indirect supervision".
He also admitted to other inappropriate contact with animals, the nature of which is so confronting the ABC has chosen not to publish the details. In the decision, which the tribunal made public this week after a hearing in December, Dr Tan's conduct was found to amount to "unprofessional conduct".Dr Tan was fined $5,000 and had conditions placed on his registration, including that he was restricted to providing veterinary treatment only when he was employed by an approved practice and under the indirect supervision and mentorship of people approved by the Veterinary Surgeons Board of SA.
In a report provided to the tribunal, a veterinary surgeon who was called to give evidence told the court some of the Dr Tan's behaviours "had no valid medical reason", were "markedly abnormal" and a "serious breach of the standards of behaviour expected of veterinarians". Dr Tan, who was born in Singapore and studied in Australia for six years before first working in veterinary practice in 2019, denied having any sexual attraction towards animals.
The tribunal noted many of the signatories were also called to give evidence before the tribunal, which Dr Tan had suggested was evidence of collusion. The tribunal did not find evidence of collusion but said it made findings on the basis of the complaint only.
Veterinary Surgeon Adelaide Sanctions Inappropriate Acts Animals Fine Reprimand Practice Supervision
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »
Source: newscomauHQ - 🏆 9. / 77 Read more »
Source: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »