Earlier this year, I was swimming laps to raise money for charity and I set myself a goal of a certain distance over the month.
But it got me pondering the philosophical question: if you swim 10 kilometres and someone else swims five kilometres on your behalf, did you really swim 15 kilometres? What about if you swim 10 kilometres and pay to release some fish in a river? Can you then count 100 kilometres?Net carbon accounting follows the same principle.
Presumably everyone knows that the goal of net-zero by 2050 is a net goal, since the clue is in the name. This is appropriate because it would be extremely difficult to get to zero and still do what we need to do to sustain human life and society without offsets to mop up the residual, impossible-to-abate, but necessary emissions.With appropriate technology, it might even be possible to move into net negative territory and reverse some of the damage we have done.
About one in five facilities that come under the safeguard mechanism met their obligations by surrendering ACCUs in 2022-23.reductions by 2035. Get that? He’s referring to on-site emissions, also known as in-house or direct emissions, that isit would go harder on direct emissions. Could state governments rewrite planning laws so they can refuse projects with an unacceptable emissions output, rather than allowing them to offset under the excuse of the emissions being too difficult to abate?Of course, a net target is far better than none at all, and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s suggestion last week to walk away from the 2030 goal but keep the 2050 goal is not credible policy.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »