The Institute of Public Affairs’ Gideon Rozner told Sky News host Gemma Tognini the “opportunistic use of these bushfires by climate alarmists” has failed to
convince people of the effects of climate change on disasters like the bushfires. “I think it’s turned a lot of people off the broader cause,” Mr Rozner said. Image: Getty
More bullshit. You cant save ScottMorrisonMP . He cooked his own goose. He's gone. Zero trust, zero ability, zero leadership and tonnes of Lies. Auspol coronavirusaus
🐂💩
A recent Newspoll has found most Sky News listeners... there I fixed it for you
Who would believe Sky!?
Climate change denial is to Murdoch media's eternal shame.
The ABC said 1% was because of arson and the one arsonist got off with a good behaviour bond after destroying 68 homes, just as well the locals kick his ass in because the legal system failed
A pointless exercise. You'll be asking factory workers their opinion on fish kills in the Murray Darling Basin next. 1. Was it drought that killed the fish? 2. Was it mismanagement by the water authority? 3. Was it greedy foriegn corporate cotton growers. 4. Was it China? Doh!
The Institute of Public Affairs 😂
Sky News is Australia's fake news. While you persist with he likes of Bolt and Credlin, you have no credibility.
Murdoch spread of lies and misinformation. Every fire chief has rejected this. History will not be kind to you.
fuckoffsky you're done
Proving once again that consuming Murdoch media products will make you stupid. Take a stand against stupidity. Don’t buy Murdoch.
And whose fault is that? Media misreporting what the fire chiefs in charge of the firegrounds are citing as the actual causes? People will believe what you idiots tell them to believe, but you already know that don’t you.
Newspoll...as in the one that so accurately predicted the federal election result 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
When you constantly feed disinformation then poll the masses to to make your disinformation seem credible
FFS....because the every day person is fully studied up on all facets of this debate? What a useless poll.
56% is not most!
Nice one sky 'news'
Did you read the tweet? 'Hazard reduction caused bushfires.' Read it slowly. Better grammar from a newspaper please.
Man-made to make it look like it was climate change climate change is a hoax
And let's not forget that most were arson
Does itmatter it won't bring the baby back to the bath water
35% brainwashed to have faith in the religious climate cult.
Didn’t ask about drought? The drought was on steroids due to CC. Massive fuel build up and DRYING of vegetation in winter and spring caused by enhanced drought. skynewsfail: too stupid to even frame the question properly!
Rubbish from a rubbish news network run by a rubbish wrinkly creepy old man that has never understood the concept of a round earth.
It doesn't freaking matter how many people believe that the Earth is flat, it will keep on being round!
Well I'm reassured. All we need to do is take a vote on it, and it will the problem go away.
Due 2 continuous drought a byproduct of Global warming the actual term for the soft term climate change it restricted back burning allowing fuel to build up which is why fires where so intense along with multiple 40’+ days so they r not separate they r all byproduct of CC
First and only point...this is from Sky News. Credibility
Well if Murdoch's empire makes you believe lies, I'm extra glad that I cancelled my kayosports subscription. Because the facts state that lightning strikes caused the vast majority.
Can’t have a fire without fuel
WTF! How could 'hazard reduction' cause bushfires? It's carried out during the winter for a start! You people are stupid!
Must have been a very shonky poll. The questions must have been bizarre to skew the results so weirdly
100 percent of anyone who has done ANY FUCKING RESEARCH into right-wing click-bait alarmist BULLSHIT believes should be trusted less than the average dead cat when it comes to ANYTHING to do with the systematic KILLING of the planet
, where intelligence goes to die.
Then 56% need to watch this instead of the lies from Sky.
So 56% of people believe that hazard reduction burning escaped causing the devastation or is it that Skynews despite being a media company cannot construct a sentence?
Since the majority of Australians have no direct way of knowing the cause, this just proves that newscorp and its US bot team are better resourced to spread bullshit people want to hear. Try next summer when land Already burnt to fuck starts burning again
This is exactly the sort of rubbish that has seen Newscorp profits fall by 85% globally. Please keep it up.
The relevant section is 36 seconds in. We are not that silly, just so you know.
There you see, quite Australians know this land and how we should care for it, now to get virtual signalling idiot politicians to be realistic about climate change and change hazard reductions laws.
Wait, hazard reduction causes fires? I'm thinking your viewers are as stupid as your writers. Hazard reduction was the major cause of fires, while the same nuts insist there wasn't enough hazard reduction. You realise, you're not making sense, right?
They have less than a third of the followers of ABC news. All we are doing by commenting here is boosting their numbers. Sky News and their lying ilk are a dying breed. And not soon enough.
sovereignity77 It also followed 3 years of draught - not uncommon & was blown nearer the SE coastal population more than usual. MSM doesn’t even try to understand Oz ‘continental climate’ or Oz indigenous flora & fauna where fire is endemic, regular, necessary & recovery comparatively quick.
Annnd the winner ........“the completely fucking obvious”
Lefties will be furious at such logic being shown by the majority
🤪🤔🤔🤔I never was asked nor anyone I know , so this is FAKE NEWS 🖕🏿🖕🏿🖕🏿
Based and redpilled
Push polling at work, well done 👍
They can’t everget their story correct. It should have read, “lack of hazard reduction.”
Great to see Aussies are not stupid. My confidential source says there's been no hazard reduction burning in NSW for 7 years.
Reliable?
🙄 alternative headline 'Accurate use of bushfires by climate acceptors starts to cut through' ClimateCrisis ClimateEmergency ClimateChange lowcarboneconomy
It’s a sky news poll! What do U expect. It’s ‘Fox News lite’
In that case those surveyed Australians are mostly wrong.
Well done arseholes.
I can't believe this pole, what joke! As if 35% of people believe cLiMaTe cHaNgE was responsible. NO WAY! It would be more 15% at the most... To get numbers as high as 35% the pole must have been conducted on a greens twitter page surely...
More fake news that's Scottys Rhetoric your pushing.
What the general population think is really irrelevant, most have no clue. Listen to experts and follow their advice.
A recent poll also found that over 95% of ‘statistics’ that are posted by Sky News are made up. An alarming 100% of ‘journalists’ that work there are also 100% certain of getting their annual bonus if they tow ‘old crusty as fuck’s’ political line.
Can we really describe this as ‘most’. Surely it’s ‘just over half’ at best?
Sky news should be called fake news
Yes thanks to you and your campaign of misinformation. Well done!!
Brainwormed cuntry
Hard to fathom (other than due misinformation campaign) that Oz public has so much difficulty accept obvious fact such that 'hazard reduction' was carried out but proved ineffective in the face of extreme weather events resulting from current rapid rate of climate change. auspol
To recap - The 97% of CO2, which produced naturally by Nature is fine, but the 3% which is produced by Humanity, will end all life on the Planet in 11 years, unless we hand over AUSTRALIA'S Sovereignty to the UN's OneWorldGovernment? 🤔 NO!!! auspol2020 CorruptGovernment
The 35% are complete fools and should be called out for their dopey views and obvious delusion when it comes to reality.
Lied to relentlessly by Sky and it's paid fossil fool mouthpieces, backed by a massive social media spend by vested interests, yes, you have managed to confuse some sheep. Those who understand science and reality are sticking with the truth.
As usual I assume you asked the staff in the news room and extrapolated
80% of people I speak with think Sky News and the Murdoch press are dangerous bullshit artists who should be hounded from our country
Misinformation deliberately spread. Fire chiefs and others denied it by explaining it was the narrow window of opportunity that allows safe prevention burning but ignored by News Corp who deliberately spread the story.
Just shows how successful was Murdoch broadcasting of the Lib focus group dead cat and/or how ignorant is the average Australian. Either that, or your poll is another piece of squalid corporate propaganda.
Congratulations Qantas for your part in helping to gaslight an entire continent. Attacks on science and knowledge, coming to a lounge near you soon.
What? No mention of ARSONISTS!!! Just another FAKE poll with FAKE NEWS!! Totally disgusting!
How can hazard reduction cause a bushfire unless it escapes? What bull💩
Newspoll? Are you serious?....... about as useful as a turd in an old typewriter......and their “journalism” is pretty much, what came out of it
NateG23799041 I’d like to see how many people were polled and where from can’t believe we have 35% so stupid to believe the climate hoax
Those people that said these fires were caused by climate change are crazy.
And the Academy of Science view? You know the guys whose view actually matter. Oh...what was that...you do don't do science at SkyNews.
Don’t actually believe anything from u guys
Ignorance is tenacious. Encountered this very comment yesterday and the ignorance extended into it being called backburning. There are none so deaf as those who do not hear even the very Head of NSWRFS refuting this very notion. Big market for hearing aids.
Mmmm. Because Gideon Rozer of the IPA is all about the broader cause of climate change
This is only due to irresponsible false reporting by stations like yourselves who pour enormous energy into peddling outrage and bullshit and over-riding the experts on every subject. Is this really all you have got? FFS - you people should be ashamed of yourselves.
you ppl dont know anything about hazard reduction.
Maybe 56% of your viewers. And it would probably be less if you reported facts instead of opinions 🤷🏻♀️
If true, further proof of the media's culpability in spreading misinformation.
But what are the facts? Science ignored 7NewsAustralia abcnews
So glad Newscorp aren't climate change denialists, despite breathless, moronic, daily evidence to the contrary.
IF this is so it is because of the irresponsible journalism of newscorp and others. Hang your heads in shame ThisisNotJournalism BoycottMurdoch Boycottnewscorp fakenews climatecriminals
Not that I agree with this being representative of the truth, but the question included the word 'severity', what was the cause of the severity of the fires, & two responses were given as options. So, the IPA & Skynews can keep their lies. So, I call BULLSHIT 💩💩💩
56% of Australians believe the lies of newscorp
The publicly funded news corps continues to destroy the world one headline at a time. Such dangerous ‘learners’ should be cut from the public teat.
Your propaganda program must be working
The people polled are misinformed and have a lack of understanding of climate change and the conditions in which these bushfires occurred. Perhaps too many of them have been influenced by LNP and Murdoch press. What ultimately matters is the knowledge of scientific experts.
So 56% of people were wrong about something. You can’t have surveys about facts.
I refuse to actually read up on what scientists are saying and do my own research so I’m just gonna go along with what the Murdoch press says and blame the firefighters for not doing enough HRBs. It’s all their fault.
The corrupt propaganda machine rolls on as Sky 'news' sells out Australia for $$$ How much $$$ do you receive from fossil fuels & mining industry ? propaganda WagTheDog
Congratulations on a successful misinformation campaign.
Job done, dickheads. Australians died but still you push bullshit about hazard reduction from clueless partisans waging culture wars, instead of listening to evidence and experts so that we can better prepare for and mitigate future BlackSummers. Shameful.
..what about the ‘climate change alarmists’ playing there ‘climate change’ card while the major bushfires were raging.
Wait didn’t Newspoll predict a Labor win in the last election?
LOL. STOP GLOBAL WHINING
Yes I am sure KRM will be handing bonuses out of your crashing profits for that dubious but successful smear campaign. Well played, in a high school debating club, private school bully, kind of way.
Absolute rubbish Fake News that's what Morrison wants to hear.
We don't deserve this planet
I'm sorry who cares what most people think? Most people are ignorant mouth breathing nimrods. That's why we have professions, who specialise in fields of study &who's knowledge and technical expertise we value and trust. So, ya know Janitors don't end up running nuclear plants.
The people you poll
the real truth is the LNP was elected...deal with it
Most Australians? No. Most of those surveyed. Perhaps. How was the sampling done? Where were the subjects sourced? Newscorpse subscribers? This shows nothing more than most of those sampled know very little about the actual mechanisms of bushfires and ClimateChange auspol
The brainwashing isn't complete yet.
Why am I never asked to be in these polls I'm Australian. Most Australians know arsonists are responsible, fact
Breaking news, 35% of Australians are dumber than a box of rocks.
Sky news Australia... A George Soros company.
Not the case in Cobargo. Aerial maps pre fire, show cleared farmland around the town. No forest enroaching on towned area. Half the main street destroyed! Drought, fuelled by CC, caused tinder dry, National parks. Sadly, this fuelled the felocity & devastion of the fires.
35% incredibly stupid people
davidwoody13 Really? Seriously!
35% are the unemployable Labor/Green voters who enjoy a bong once or twice a day🤣
It's amazing how continued lies by the Murdochcracy can change ppl's perceptions of reality.
The Indian Ocean Dipole is now being seen by scientists as a key cause of Australia’s recent drought, which of course led to the fires. There’s a view that the Indian Ocean Dipole – or IOD - should be as much a household name as the Pacific Ocean’s El Nino
Utter contrived, confected, shameful bollocks.
Newspoll lol
newscomauHQ australian abcnews ABCmediawatch abc730 QandA ABCPolitics SBS 7NewsAustralia 9NewsAUS 10NewsFirstQLD ScottMorrisonMP smh NewsTalk4BC 2GB873 MomentsAU guardiannews GCBulletin bauermedia 7NewsGoldCoast 9NewsGoldCoast TheTodayShow sunriseon7 cnni
People are so gullible in relation to climate change propaganda. Yes hazard reduction wasn't done & big issue. As for the rest total rubbish.
Just cancel your Foxtel subscription...if you’re one of the shrinking pool of current subscribers. I’m about to...
Gee twist the facts much.
So propaganda works.
So you did a poll to show your lies and misinformation are working to confuse people. More misinformation.
Which means 9% don't have opine. Take the survey/poll in areas affected by fires not in inner city latte loop of woke wankers
Toxic liars on are traitors to the nation and humanity
did they do the survey in a fish and chip shop in ipswich? or at a fraser anning party? maybe malcom roberts friends answered?
That's because 56% of Australians, aren't raving, lunatics!
Is this a poll to prove the people who read/view newscorps media are are influenced by their propaganda rather than facts?
“Most Australians”...? Do better ...
Hmm 35% of Aussies are fuckwits.
arson.
A recent Newspoll found that most Australians - 84% - know that IPA is a bucket of bull-crap and their polls are meaningless.
The beauty about sky news is that if you want to chose any side of a discussion or argument, just pick the opposite to sky news and you’ll be right.
Do we go with the 56 that are wrong or the 35 that are right? The evidence lies with climate change. Its an inconvenient truth for those who want to profit from the counter story. But skynews knows not of truth.
The 35% who say it's climate change are living in fantasy land. Fires have always been a way of life here in Oz and always will be. But how we respect the land will make a huge difference as to when, where and how the fires start.
Did a radio survey once.Guy was excited because I said I loved 2GB,when he returned in 2 weeks,I had painstakingly filled the survey out without a 2GB segment.He was distraught that I had misled him.When I questioned his neutrality,he told me he was an Jones fan?
Gato188 You mean the LACK of hazard reduction.
Well it f****ing well does cut through. While ever there is 1 just 1, idiot out there talking about climate change like ancient God Atlas holds up the world on his shoulders and govt or UN can do the same we have insanity and idiocy ruling our existence on earth.
That's not a surprise.. you notice all the Climate trolls and UN believers blowing up at that news. 'How dare they publish that'
I don't know where you do your polling.... but I disagree.. everyone knows the weather has gone crazy
Well propaganda & media lies does have an effect on the ill informed. Fire experts & scientists have another story. They’re called facts.
Sky news Newspoll. Still laughing. Did the ask a handful of LNP MPs?
No shit so when are you going to apologise to the PM after slandering him during the Bush Fires ? Australia sees straight though to agenda driven Fake News!!
How does this ‘most Australians’ tag get applied? Neither myself or anyone I know has ever been polled by Newspoll. You may not have my details in your database (although I’m sure you do) but to make such a spurious and encompassing claim is complete bollocks.
now get them to define ‘main cause’
Then it will just happen again... and again
And guess what, fire officials disagree with that. But that might interfere with right wing agenda. auspol
That doesn't = most people don't believe in ClimateCrisis in fact just the opposite....
Stop spreading lies u muppets
Newspoll is conducted for extreme right wing deniers at Sky News and The Australian - has to be weighted accordingly.
Is anyone in this country (other than the readers and viewers of Newscorp) taking the results of Newspoll seriously? LOL
I thought they were arson.
You should be so proud
The climate cultists are really unhappy with this poll. Poor things.
You make it sound like a voting matter. Science is not a belief system.
Is this a check on throughput of misinformation? Democratic layman answer to scientific problem? Maybe it's good grounds for ficc fairness doctrine in media legislation?
Well done Sky News, your program of bullshit reporting, blatant lies and LNP propaganda is working. If only Murdoch would stop dictating the topics we discuss, the world would be a better place. ThisisNotJournalism
It's not about belief. And if you run a poll choosing one or the other that's deceptive. It's both hazard reduction and climate change.
I wonder if they actually thought 'Lack of' hazard reduction?
Belief is for religion. All you've done is prove that 56 percent (of how many?) of a pool of viewers have been misled by intentional misreporting and misdirection from media outlets, commentators and politicians. Thank you for proof that propaganda works.
Well as the Murdoch press repeatedly repeated the lies - what result did you expect?
Your campaign worked!
Guess 56 percent of the people you asked are big ol’ idiots.
Yes because facts are based on what people believe happened...it's like saying 50% of people believe fires need a fuel source to burn and 50% believe they need oxygen.
Cancel your Foxtel and Newscorp subscriptions. With many people still without homes, the gaslighting and lies by this malignant puss company on Australia continues unabated and is just unacceptable.
rationaliza Something is working ! Twitter ?
35% need education. Fuel reduction is the answer.
Sky News=Fake News
Good indication that bad reporting by the media can misinform a lot of people. What are you going to do about correcting this misconception that the fires were due to back burning? Even the RFS aren’t saying that.
It was Scotty from marketing. He lit 🔥 the fires
it wasnt either of these things
ky33926944 'newspoll' poison ☠️
About the Labor primary vote % also think climate change causes bush fires. Ok. Got it.
ClimateCriminals ThisIsNotJournalism I hope the future brings - realisation of action needed and last ditch effort just in time - criminal courts proceedings for those who coordinated and organised delay of action for their own personal and financial gain
So basically, an education failure rate of 35%.
Guess your gobbelsian methods in perpetuating the hazard reduction nonsense have worked.
It’s a red herring perpetrated by the marketing man everyone knows there are not enough days to fit the criteria to do hazard reduction burns in any calendar year to make one iota of difference especially drought years Fire services keep saying this over and over
Were these scientists or school of hard knocks graduates? 😂😂😂
So despite what the experts told us 56% of people beleived the lies you put out.
I’ll stick to to those fighting the fires, for the information.
35% are wrong
I’m canceling my Foxtel subscription and reclaiming Sunday mornings from insiders. This is more gaslighting of the Australian people, as if there’s nothing to see here at all. The corruption and incompetence is plain to see except by you.
Bullshit.
I know who has the more valid points!!
Who was responsible for hazard-reduction burns 2018-19 57 Bushfire Inquiries AND All 57 Inquiries recommended more hazard-reduction burns. Heads---Should---Roll. Who was responsible Was it Shane Fitzsimmons or Matt Kean NSW Minister for the Environment?
Alot of Salty Leftys on here today. And loving it.
35%? That's still 40% more than you idiots at Sky.
They forgot it was arson in most cases.
So obviously you guys think a reasonable amount of time has passed since the fires went out and you can now return to business as usual? surprisednotsurprised climatechangedeniers murdochracy
Climate change is the new 'Dying God' religion. Any non-believer is a white male witch that just want's to see the world burn, and yet the contradiction is we have only 8-12 years left on the earth anyway. 🤔 The mind boggles with these stone-age throwbacks and their mysticism.
What a sickening headline glad i had Foxtel cut off!
56% live outside the city and see the build up in the bush.
Gee, I wonder if it had anything to do with the garbage your organisation produces and calls 'news'.
So who is telling the truth on newspoll results? Experience says that Sky News version may be biased
Utter bullshit, I can only imagine how the question was framed 🤣 pack of tools you lot 🙄
Australians are not stupid.
45% being ~50% more than expectation.
What question was actually asked? Murduch Newspolls are well known for loaded questions when the PM's net satisfaction is well below zero...as it is in this case. Then the spin doc's have some news to work with.
And thats right if we backburned the fires would of been much less hazadous and most where lit by pple
So a majority of Australians are idiots. That’s not actually surprising.
More like 56 per cent of Australians know bushfires was a big part of climate change . We have a fake prime minister and now we have fake news poll.
Sky News, experts at ignoring facts.
I guess all those scientists are wrong innit?
Climate change didnt suck gigalitres of water away from the eastern states.
56%? Well that’s wrong because none of my family or friends were asked.
So uneducated opinion trumps scientific fact? arrgg
Even the RFS says hazard reduction wasn't the driving issue
Bullshit
That poll is Bull shit like our crime minister.
Holy crap sky news. What is wrong with you?
So the poll was more a reflection on how well your propaganda works. Rather than how much people understand?
So the pile on of frenzied brainwashing did not work? Australians might not be as stupid as the left wing media would like them to be? (As was shown in the election.)
Really 35% of Australians are stupid that’s a little more than I expected. What with all the information at hand ie All the arsonists that we’re caught some red handed all the bush fuel and all the other non climate change issues we have and they still believe it’s all CC 🤯
'Opportunistic use of bushfires by climate alarmists' fails to cut through' All the writers and commentators for this channel are fucked in the head.
Ha Haha Hahahaha “Climate change” Fucking idiots
The postulation is absurd. The fires have many ways to ignite. Hazard reduction burns isn't one them.
Sky News quoting Gideon Rozner - the blind leading the blind!
When are we going to get proper informed journalism in this country. They are not necessarily separate issues!
Murdoch must be running scared to get you to put ‘tis fake news out. Shy Newd Australia is a National disgrace
How many people were polled?
I'm shocked that the unthinking citizen's national paper returned such results. Shocked I tell you. I thought Oz readers were deeply critic-haha nah ok I can't keep that up
What Crap.
So hazard reduction was the cause? Sky on the ball as usual.
🤷♂️ 'most Australians' are suddenly experts of Bushfires?
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »