“It needs to be recognised they’re doing the job they’re put there for, they’re testing all of this, they’re teasing it out,” he told Sky News host Peta Credlin.
“I want to make this plea to people who say they’re holding back: they want to know that they can secure the best possible deal.” Mr Anderson said a deal needs to include soundly based technology pathways which can provide the energy which is required for Australian farmers to continue to improve their productivity.“It has to be real answers.”
And by 'regional Australia', they mean the Minerals Council.
Why are we even talking net zero It’s insane to even attempt it with current technologies ! You only need to look at Europe and the USA to see the results !!
I feel that in this issue, the most important thing is that we have to change, there is a plan to change, reduce carbon emissions, or even zero emissions are integrated in the future industry chain, not zero emissions and zero emissions
The best deal with whom? And who voted for that
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Barnaby Joyce preparing to back net zero, with conditionsThe Nationals leader has cleared the way for a goal to cut carbon emissions to net zero by 2050 in return for a better deal for regional Australia. auspol climatechange In which the government’s pantomime to make net zero commitment appear significant while business as usual for their fossil fuel mates continues unabated enters the final act What BS. Let's pretend the coalition supports climate change, a decade behind the rest of the world. Hey Barn. Smash WA borders open 👍 we want to see our family in the east. McGowan is power drunk !
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Barnaby Joyce preparing to back net zero, with conditionsThe Nationals leader has cleared the way for a goal to cut carbon emissions to net zero by 2050 in return for a better deal for regional Australia. CroweDM How is it possible that one man dictates our policy on an issue such as this? CroweDM Morrison-Albanese Zero Emissions Target by 2050 The National Party wants multibillion-dollar green investments to be spent in the regions WB: I Want all Pensioners to get $100 a week pension increase to cover ongoing cost of power bills from Zero Emissions Target by 2050 CroweDM Rupert must of really cracked that whip! What is the name for a bunch of tools? A shamble if tools seems adequate
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
'There will be pain', but WA Nationals back net zero carbon targetWhile the federal Nationals remain divided on net zero, the party's WA branch has nailed its colours to the mast and backed a 2050 target. Why make the transition seem like a chore? Jobs & Zero Emissions Pretending to care before the federal election and then tell us it's too expensive after!
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Australian farmers call for economically viable path to net zero by 2050National Farmers Federation president Fiona Simson says primary producers are ready to get behind the target, but will not carry the load for others. ''Government must not expect prime farm land to be converted to a massive carbon sink,'' Well it would only be converting it back to the way it was 🙄 Progressive farmers have worked out the more carbon in their soil the more profitable they are. Carbon capture subsidises itself. Farmers plead for yet more assistance to maintain their way of life and farming practices. *image of land transformed to dusty hellscape by current farming practices* should have started decades ago
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »
Reaching net zero by 2050 will be ‘very expensive’Just To change the power grid to 100% Renewables will cost Australians $1 Trillion + And we will pay for it on our power bills I Want all Pensioners to get $100 a week pension increase to cover on going cost of power bills from Zero Emissions Target by 2050 Very stupid and very deadly. And for nothing.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Industries to be shielded in federal bid for net zeroThe government is preparing to reveal its new climate targets and technology road map early next week with a message to industry that there are no “nasties” in the package. CroweDM Some pretty basic questions: Will the emissions target be enough to limit warming to 2 degrees? (Ans: No) Therefore, is it in line with Paris Agreement? (Ans: No) In line with targets scientists are suggesting? (Ans: No) Does it include rapid short term reductions? (Ans: No) CroweDM So Murdoch is giving the govt cover by suddenly running with spreads about climate change. Softening up the sheep so they think Morrison and co are doing something. Complete sham. CroweDM We aren't stupid. Taylor and Morrison cannot be trusted. NOT AT ALL!
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »