Illustration: Callum Abbot/The GuardianIllustration: Callum Abbot/The Guardian
The landmark civil rights case for which Obergefell served as lead plaintiff capped a string of court victories for LGBTQ+ people in the US, including a ban on criminalizing gay sex and the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. It appeared to signal a new era of tolerance and civil rights in the US.“People are terrified,” he says. “They’re rightly afraid of losing the right to marry the person they love.
Precedent is “one of the most important things in the American legal system,” they said. “Previous judicial decisions are binding on all other courts, and this decision tampers with that.”Roe v Wade hinged on a right to privacy, a concept whose constitutional fuzziness Justice Alito attacked full-on, while Obergefell, Lemberg says, is different because it’s “explicitly linked to the equal clause of 14th amendment”.
it followed to overturn Roe to “reconsider” Lawrence, Obergefell and Griswold – the cases that established the rights to same-sex relationships, same-sex marriage and contraception. If that were to happen, the lives of these longterm couples would be upended. Here’s what they are thinking:“Marriage was a way to offer protections,” says Bobbi Lopez, who identifies as cis queer and serves on the executive board of the California Democratic party.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Roe v Wade couldn't happen in Australia, but abortion still isn't a guaranteed rightA situation like Roe v Wade could never overturn abortion rights in Australia, but legal and reproductive rights advocates say significant barriers to access remain and reform is needed to protect people's rights going forward. Abortion is a crime ! A vida começa na nidação: encontro do óvulo com espermatozoide, no útero. Há formas de prevenção à gravidez, simplesmente e de graça ! Thank you so much Texas!!! Remember when you decide to advocate for abortions, You will lose thousands of thousands of votes from Queensland!! 👍👍👍😜😜😜🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞😍😍💃💃💃🎈🎈🎈😍😍😍😍🐼🐼🐼🐼🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍💛
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Democrats hope to tap anger over Roe in November midterms – will it work?Analysts say more voters should turn out in the wake of the supreme court ruling – but that could help Republicans too
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »
Roe v Wade: senators say Trump supreme court nominees misled themNeil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh said they would not overturn landmark abortion ruling, Susan Collins and Joe Manchin say Wow! Gullible much! Even us casual observers knew they were lying 🤦🏼♀️ I’m now a male judge making decisions that impact women - trust me! Pathetic - Senators are not victims. They are liars who want to keep a juicy job. They knew the terrain, they chose the judges and now they are throwing up their hands and saying 'how could we have known?' No sympathy from this woman.
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »
What overturning Roe v Wade means for Australia“It is a really stark reminder to us that even rights that we have so-called won, because they are legislated, could be overturned or wound back and that could depend on the government of the day” Should never have been the supreme court's decision in the first place. Setting public policy should lie at the feet of elected position's debating the issue. Scomo would have been into doing this enabled by your boss and and MurdochGutterMedia Reproductive Healthcare belongs to the individual not the government. You can ban abortion but it won’t stop abortions! If that ever happened here, I’d get a hysterectomy.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
‘Anger, frustration and grief’ felt amid overturning of Roe v WadeOf course he does! We're all $^%$%) Great decision. People are panicking because they don’t understand the ruling. They presume what it means. Why? What the hell does a US court ruling have to do with him?
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Roe v Wade: senators say Trump supreme court nominees misled themNeil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh said they would not overturn landmark abortion ruling, Susan Collins and Joe Manchin say They did. It they didn’t actually lie. That’s the thing. They chose their senate jobs over doing the right thing. Using the I'm a stupid idiot who can't see what's right in front of me because I have the intelligence of an amoeba defence. Ok.
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »