Hitler, terrorism, Port Arthur: Should some subjects be off limits?

, Taika Waititi played Adolf Hitler as a needy imaginary friend.," says Jackie French, the author of a trilogy of novels about the Fuhrer for younger readers. "It's Hitler as a. How could this quite silly man convince people – including the King of England – it was the moral thing to do, the right thing to do, to exterminate people?"French says that at the last talk she gave on the subject, a 10-year-old asked her "who is Hitler?". It was a salutary moment.

Significantly, though, there was no suggestion the film should not be made, only a desire for it to be made respectfully, in a way that did not add unduly to the stress and trauma of survivors, first responders, and relatives and friends of the victims. "If you don't explore you're left in ignorance," says Valent. "There were things not explored in the past, like sexual abuse or clerical abuse or domestic violence, and not exploring them didn't make them stop."

But Chris Cantor, a retired psychiatrist who wrote a couple of academic papers about the psychology of mass shooters just prior to Port Arthur, isn't so sure. No matter how negative the portrait of a perpetrator, the mere fact they are being mentioned is fuel to the fire and likely to inspire copycats.

Source: Entertainment Trends (entertainmenttrends.net)

karlkwin No.

karlkwin Like how Nazism is acceptable to Australian soldiers?

karlkwin It's still too soon and far too raw for the families of the people who were murdered. The script will require some back story about Bryant and I for one couldn't give a shit. Let him rot alone and quietly.

karlkwin Depends. Historically accurate (or as can be made) is fine, rom-com starring will Ferrell not so much. It shouldn’t be glorified but given as the final cause for our gun laws to help end such horrific events.

karlkwin Not Port Arthur. We still don't know the truth.

karlkwin If they were SBS would be out of business.

karlkwin Plenty of people have made money writing books about Port Arthur and the massacre. Why are films treated differently? In the end of response of audiences and the market will determine whether it was a good idea to make this film or not.

karlkwin Banning the movie will serve to give it more air as is this article. It’s a free country last time I looked

karlkwin No. Nothing should be off limits.

karlkwin No more steak for adults, children are unable to chew it.

karlkwin No, history reminds us today is because of it.

karlkwin There’s plenty of movies about Hitler and terrorism. And many Aussie filmmakers have shined a light on terrible events in our nation’s history in the past. Why should we skip this one?

karlkwin Oh yes of course. We wouldn’t want to ever acknowledge that Nazi Germans killed 17 million people and it took the west 6 years to start to do something about it and another 6 years to remove them.

karlkwin keep talk about this things and if a copycat do something then who is responsible? not me but YOU IDIOTS

karlkwin Conservative opinion already censored by billionaire BigTech

karlkwin No!

karlkwin Lol should research be off limits? Same question.

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Scott Morrison facing Port Arthur moment says senatorJohn Howard overhauled gun legislation, Paul Keating reset the relationship with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and now Scott Morrison is facing his moment, a senior Labor figure says. Nonsense, COVID-19 was the Port Arthur moment. A bunch of women women have hijacked a tragic suicide to speak about themselves. Show facts, not opinions, and then action is obvious. He’ll fuck it up for sure As a society, Australia must do better. This is not a political issue, but it does require engagement and leadership from the top, to drive and underpin societal change. Political inertia/stonewalling must end. Morrison must find the courage, and will, to lead the way or resign.
Source: newscomauHQ - 🏆 9. / 77 Read more »

As Port Arthur anniversary approaches, let us never speak his nameOpinion: It is appropriate that Australia mark the 25th anniversary of our worst mass shooting, but let’s focus on the beautiful lives that were cut short. Let’s appreciate the grace of families who bore the burden of unimaginable sorrow. Let us never s... Martin Bryant didn’t do it, maybe we should start to talk about it
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »

Port Arthur massacre: 25 years on, are gun laws the best they can be?Just 12 days after the Port Arthur massacre, the nation's worst in modern times, gun laws changed forever — 25 years on, there is concern controls on gun ownership in Australia have been weakening. Coming from America to living in Australia for the past 20ish years. I feel safe sending my children to school. That says so much about not only the gun laws but who Australians are as a whole. Chines Gov Ocean toxic pollution Ethnic Genocide Gives the World the C-Virus Hmm: Nothing from our ABC about China? how many mass shootings have their been in this country since Howard brought these laws in? i think the result speaks for itself.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »

Port Arthur and gun control: we cannot rest on our laurelsWe honour the memory of that horrific day through continued vigilance to reduce firearm injury and death in our community. Deep State organised... Fortunately, Trump and the Military are now in full control... The global swamp is almost empty!!! SW Sydney must have been exempt from the gun buy back all those years ago. Can we ban these silly violent video games as a start.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »

'Unforgettable day for all the wrong reasons': Port Arthur massacre 25 years on25 years ago today, Australia experienced its deadliest mass shooting. We look back at how the Port Arthur tragedy changed Australia forever. 9News suffer the past , brought to you by nine news , free suffering everyone for free
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »