The government argues, however, that the new inquiry will have broader terms of reference with powers to look at child support, domestic violence and family law. Fair enough.
Under parliamentary privilege in July, Ms Hanson said her son had not seen his male child for five years because her former daughter-in-law had made false accusations against her son, including that he was sexually molesting his child. Ms Hanson might argue that despite her personal situation she can keep an open mind as deputy chair but she showed in a radio interview on Wednesday that she is not waiting for the evidence before making up her mind.
She also said that it was the Family Law Court’s fault that three men were suiciding a week and a woman was being murdered each week. She seems to have plucked the statistics on male suicide out of the air, which is par for the course.
It is disgraceful that this highly biased individual is put into such a role.
I take it ScoMo is looking for an excuse to ignore the findings of the last 3 inquiries.
JaneCaro Hanson, a terrible choice!
She only wants it for the extra money and try and defend her son that apparently abused his child and wife.
We can but hope ScottMorrisonMP , or someone on his team, reads this well reasoned opinion, and acts accordingly. Apart from whatever one thinks of PaulineHansonOz and her policies, her ineptitude for such a position is revealed every time she opens her mouth.
Hanson: a terrible choice for anything...
“This isn’t about picking sides. I mean, you literally do need the wisdom of Solomon in dealing with these issues,” Mr Morrison told Nine. He picked Hanson, go figure.
Agree. She has an agenda an her bias is obvious.
Pretty poor choice as a senator too
No shit Sherlock.
It’s a terrible choice and all what’s on her mind is what happened to her son.
Of course you left my wankers would say this PaulineHansonOz how predictable...keep up the terrific work Pauline. You too JacquiLambie we need more women like you too in politics & society generally
You think?
What a great distraction for the government.
JaneCaro Looks like an ad for The Joker movie
She's a useless, clueless, no integrity snd xenophobic mp who should give it up.
Hanson flip flops on everything and she will do the same here! She will, again, come unstuck!
And as an elected member of the Senate.
This really isn't an editorial. It's straight up fact.
yep
And as a mother-in-law.
JaneCaro The perfect choice when your intentions are insincere.
This woman has no idea & it’s actually dangerous for her to chair this inquiry
SMH Editorial “Opinion” = Traitorous garbage propaganda Time is up suckers! We don’t believe you anymore.
JaneCaro Hanson is a terrible choice full stop.
Hanson is simply a terrible choice for anything.
Editorial: Hanson a terrible choice for [insert subject here]
I say give her a chance, she has just as much right to deputy chair as any other parliamentarians, just because she isn't left wing is not a good enough reason, I wouldn't trust the SMH, they are too biased.
She's not ageing well either is she?
What the actual fuck. Am I living in a parallel universe...? she can barely speak intelligibly let alone chair a law inquiry
Perhaps a distraction to take the public eyes off what Morrison is really up to!
Once again, the Coalition parties lead the way in trashing parliamentary conventions. Moreover the choice of Senator Hanson as Deputy Chair is reprehensible given her statements in support of some pre-determined opinions relating to domestic violence.
Nearly Everyone: Hanson a terrible choice for deputy chair of family law inquiry
Of course it is. She is barely literate.
Coalition Scott Morrison needs her to Legislating to crashing death,Unions then WORKERS BASIC HUMANS RIGHTS. LIBERATION ALL WORK CHOICES AT THE HANDS OF EMPLOYERS,ALSO ROYAL COMMISSIONS WITHOUT JURISDICTION ON OH&S BREACHES TO WORKERS DEATHS DISBLITY INJURES,HOW THEY BEEN TREATED
A terrible choice period
This is Pauline Hanson's FAMILY LAW AND CHILD SUPPORT policy folks. 3 sentences. That's it, in totality.
You mean she might just ask some unwelcome questions , and point out some inconvenient facts
I pity the ppl who depend on family law, with PH at the helm.
How the feminists fear the truth of an AVO rort. Much like the campus rape culture hoax.....like true leftists 'shut her down'
I agree she’s too emotive on this issue cos it’s personal we need someone more level headed ..
This government and its filthy salt in the wound gags, they deserve every bad thing in their lives.
She must have something over Morrison.
Speak for yourself
deniseshrivell The softest thing about Pauline Hanson is her teeth. An ugly soul for an evil being.
The judiciary bare a lot of technicians employed by us to administer our laws made by our government. No better at reasoning or common sense than any of us, including Pauline, so just piss-off.
Keep your unconsolidated comments to yourself. Bloody gutter type. You should be banned for those remarks.
She is perfect for the role
A very good choice because she will have the courage ( despite the smears, the disrespect to a woman, the haters) to address the outrageous gender bias in Family Law. Male suicides can’t be buried any longer.
Why because she'll pick holes in manipulative liars
bencubby Quote: The inquiry is supposed to look at the onus of proof required to gain an apprehended violence order, the cost of the court process and claims of false evidence being used against former partners. - personally, I agree, this does need attention. How many wronged? auspol
Hanson is the wrong appt. for the reason she has party policy on this and cannot remain impartial. However I don't see how she the author can be so horribly flippant in regards to men suiciding from Family Law Court outcomes. It's a major reason why shared-parenting law exists.
she is getting $100k extra on a committee Handy for her retirement
The bigots speak... UsualSuspects
She has now proved once and for all that she couldn't make an unbiased decision if her life depended on it. She should have never been given this responsibility due to her ignorance. This should be a lesson to all that she is useless and a self-centred.
Ha ha, sucked in you lefty scum! It's a lot of fun watching the left get left behind. All the greed, corruption and injustice is coming to an end. Dexter told us.
Hanson is a terrible choice for anything , not an ounce of intellect or credibility
ItsBouquet Shortened headline that works for any Hanson story: “Hanson a terrible choice”
No way Pauline can be a unbiased commissioner biased on her past & present statements & her personal involvement with one case, her son's. This is a political manoeuvre by the Liberals to placate her & so ensure her vote. So see through it's laughable. Women of Australia revolt
How is this allowed?,its personal for Hanson,that will make it a Danger to families. She has her own adgenda,lose Pauline & then it may be taken seriously.
Are inquiries now counted as sitting days because we seem to have more of the them then actual parliament. More pollies hands in the tax payers purse for doing something that they are a already elected for.
It’s funny how the Chief Justice of the Family Law court is the one that stated women lie for custodial and financial advantage yet the media just want to take Hanson to task in it? The only people complaining are people who have something to hide! Bring on the inquiry!
ONE among the daily occurrence of massively bad decision s for Australia , lets Bomb the Shit out of Iran is the latest , on the Bike with Trumpy
Good on you Paulene - My son rang me 'Mum help' Emily is on a roof and threatening to kill herself if i leave her! She also burnt his clothes so he could go to work, i helped them and next more evil happened she lied about him and he can't see his children - Bravo too Paulene
Pauline has an agenda, and it's got nothing to do with the rights of the child
Seriously hoping ScottMorrisonMP reads this article. I haven’t met one person of any political persuasion ( ALP , LNP or Green ) who thinks the PM has exhibited a sage decision in regards to the Co-Chair the FamilyCourtInquiry. Hanson has already given us her decision.
From the article 'This is not an issue for personal vendettas or crusades.' Somewhat ironic, as we're talking about marriage breakdowns, which are notoriously vindictive and nasty.
Don't let it happen!
It's a personal vendetta against her violent son's ex by PaulineHansonOz using parliamentary privilege. The sociopath must be stopped from deputy chairing this inquiry. Auspol FLI
Unless the inquiry calls for ignorance-based lies, racism and self interest, I'm struggling to see what inquiry might need her.
I'm happy for them to withdraw Hanson as long as they substitute someone else willing to admit that, yes, of course some wrongdoing is done by both genders in bitter marriage breakdowns and their aftermath.
Truth offends?
I suppose it’s good to have varying points of view on an inquiry. Everyone thinking the same thoughts is not good. Get everything out there for proper debate and analysis.
Pauline Hanson wins fight to launch inquiry into Family Court WB: Thank you Pauline Hanson
Well, there's one for the 'No shit, Sherlock...' file. FamilyLaw auspol
PaulineHansonOz is a terrible choice... for anything...
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: newscomauHQ - 🏆 9. / 77 Read more »
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »