Dutton’s nuclear plan contains a fib, but there’s also a fact in its favour

The car park at Murray’s Beach, on the southern head of Jervis Bay, is a monument to Australian visions about nuclear energy. The clearing in the coastal scrub, about three hours’ drive from Sydney, was meant to house a nuclear power plant in the 1970s, when Liberals in Canberra wanted to match the big projects of America and Europe.

Dutton, however, has one big fact that works in his favour. The energy grid needs new sources of reliable power to make up for the end of coal. If the country cannot build enough renewable power with storage, something else must be added to the grid. Those who oppose nuclear have to show that other energy sources can fill the gap.How big is the gap? The Clean Energy Regulator, one of the federal authorities managing the changes, said last month that Australia added about 5.

Those numbers seem plucked out of the air. Tony Wood, an energy industry expert at the Grattan Institute, is not sure what the $1.5 trillion could possibly include. “Just throwing a number out there is pretty ordinary policy, let alone politics,” he says. The number also sets up an utterly false comparison.

Right now, renewable projects supply almost 40 per cent of electricity across the grid on an annualised basis, and much more than this at peak times for wind and solar. Wood says it is possible to increase the annual figure beyond 70 per cent, or even higher, with the help of pumped hydro and batteries, but gas-fired power will be needed as well. He says it is totally wrong for Dutton to claim that renewables are responsible for higher electricity bills.

Source: Energy Industry News (energyindustrynews.net)

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Dutton’s nuclear plan contains a fib, but there’s also a fact in its favourThe opposition leader’s numbers seem plucked out of the air, but renewable projects aren’t coming anywhere near fast enough to fill Australia’s looming energy gap.
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »

Peter Dutton nuclear plan: Locals might prefer nuclear to renewable poles and wiresPeter Dutton’s nuclear energy plan could win support from communities concerned about major infrastructure upgrades needed to get solar and wind power into the grid.
Source: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 Read more »

There’s a yawning Coalition credibility gap on the cost of renewables and nuclearPeter Dutton says renewable energy is too expensive – and unveils a plan to switch to nuclear, which the CSIRO says will cost 50% more than wind or solar
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »

‘Risky nuclear scam’: Bowen launches attack on Coalition’s energy planEnergy Minister Chris Bowen has launched a scathing attack on the Coalition’s energy plan and labelled it a 'risky nuclear scam' after Peter Dutton unveiled the highly-anticipated policy.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

WA Labor labels Peter Dutton's promise to build nuclear plant near Collie as 'costly' and 'reckless'Peter Dutton's plan to build a nuclear power plant in Collie has drawn mixed reactions in the west, but it won't happen before 2050.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »

Dutton’s much-hyped nuclear ‘announcement’ is fantasy-land stuffOpposition Leader Peter Dutton says never mind the cost, trust me on nuclear power stations.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »