Trace back the digitally altered photograph of Catherine, Princess of Wales, and its roots lie in a tragedy of another Princess of Wales, Diana, whose death in 1997 predated the creation of Facebook by nearly seven years.
But now they are experiencing the darker side of public life in the Wild West of the web. Catherine’s photo, posted on social media and picked up by newspapers and broadcasters worldwide, has been swept into the maelstrom of rumours and conspiracy theories that have haunted her since she underwent abdominal surgery and receded from the public eye two months ago.
“Anyone in the royal family or their staffs who thinks that social media allows people to circumvent gatekeepers or control the narrative has not been paying attention to Meghan Markle’s experience,” Nielsen said.Credit: When Harry met Meghan, an American actress, the following year, he was exposed to an avid and expert user of social media. Meghan was running a lifestyle blog,magazine once said it was “well on the way to becoming the next Goop”, the wellness brand owned by actress Gwyneth Paltrow.after her romance with Harry became public. But she brought her astute use of social media with her into the royal family.
“The near silence over Kate’s health, which she’s perfectly entitled to observe, spooked the media and generated a social media frenzy that the mainstream media fed off,” said Peter Hunt, a former royal correspondent for the BBC. Even now, in the wake of Catherine’s confession that she had retouched the photo, a few tabloids have rallied to her defence. “Lay off Kate,” read the front page of, which is published by Rupert Murdoch and typically gives the princess generous coverage. “Attacks over edited pic are absurd,” it added.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »
Source: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 Read more »