And once again, the WikiLeaks founder — whose physical and mental health has deteriorated during the five years he's spent inside Belmarsh Prison in London — has seen the legal process to appeal his extradition to the US drawn out even further.
If the US fails to provide any assurances, leave to appeal to the High Court will be granted to Assange.As Professor Don Rothwell from the Australian National University says, Assange would then "join a queue of others seeking to have their appeals heard and determined". "The court's decision today demonstrates just how flawed the US extradition request is," Ms Robinson said.
In response to the article, Assange's US lawyer Barry Pollack said in a statement: "We have been given no indication that the Department of Justice intends to resolve the case and the United States is continuing with as much determination as ever to seek his extradition on all 18 charges, exposing him to 175 years in prison."
In 2022, when the then-UK home secretary Priti Patel approved Assange's extradition to the US, Mr Rudd said: "I disagree with this decision. I do not support Assange's actions and his reckless disregard for classified security information. But if Assange is guilty, then so too are the dozens of newspaper editors who happily published his material. Total hypocrisy.
In an open letter the groups stated: "The US prosecution of Assange undermines the country's ability to defend journalists against repression by authoritarian and other rights-abusing regimes abroad."
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »