The Albanese government is about to take its first really big risk. By breaking a major election promise. And Peter Dutton can’t wait.
He set the hares running a week ago and he’s not done a thing to try to put them back in the cage. On Friday, he actually prodded them to run a little faster: Jim Chalmers makes some accurate points. Accurate but not relevant. First is that storm clouds are gathering in the world economy. Indeed they are. An international recession is in prospect. And there’s a debt crisis under way. Countries increasingly are having difficulty servicing their debts as interest rates rise.
It’s the wrong time to deliver an inflationary budget. It’d be silly for the government to hit the economic accelerator while the Reserve Bank is hitting the brakes. And it’s inflationary to hand out tax cuts for people to spend, especially if the government has to go deeper into deficit to pay for them.
All the other arguments against stage three – that they’re unfair, that they’re regressive, that they’re wasteful – have always existed. So what’s really changed? The politics.
I love a good backflip, espec with a degree of difficulty this high.
Wasn’t the first promise to have an enquiry into the death of Kimberly Kitching. Kimberly said she was bullied by Penny Wong and Katy Gallagher.
he is still not convinced the electorate believes him
So where's the ICAC morrisson promised ? Note everyone remembers when Labor changed their mind ,but not when the coalition did .
Good decision by AlboMP and supported by the majority - economic times have changed and it would be irresponsible to implement a tax cut with a LNP trillion dollar debt - plus go after trust funds and inheritance where the rich hide their $$
More tax relief means more money spent on goods & services 🤔
Could reframe as breaking promises not the norm for Albanese government. Predecessor would probably just have brushed it away by lying that it was never promised.
I will not vote Labor if they do not get rid of the stage 3 tax cuts.
We could/Should direct these better by 1) paying back debt and deficit (if the stimulus was going to adversely impact inflation or result in interest rate rises) If not inflationary infrastructure to improve productivity and efficiency. Housing, education, health etc.
Good.
With the debt that was left by the LNP , I think it would be foolish to proceed with those cuts. That debt needs to be paid down and there are other things that are important…. ThecRich don’t need to get richer
Why is there so much angst over modest tax cuts for hardworking mums and dads. We spend billions on welfare. Its time the taxpayers who pay for this welfare get to keep a little more of their earned money. Fantastic that AlboMP is standing by his word! stage3taxcuts
Surprise surprise 😨😨
The rich don’t need tax cuts -if they all paid the taxation that they should pay then we would all be better off.
For people buying houses for multi-million dollars, they want tax cuts too? In an economic crisis? It would utterly irresponsible to implement such tax cuts.
Let’s not forget the Christian based precedent of the beleaguered LNP
Force Majeure in my view. Its a good move
It's not breaking your promise when there is new information available
SMH says I have 5 free artcles remaining and that I MUST sign up or else ... should I care? Naaah.
is that a fact or an opinion ,asking for a tax payer
And SMH should be praising him, Not putting him down. How hard it must be to report on something that is not ripping into someone
Part of the problem with Australian politics is how the media portrays political decisions. Labor made commitments pre-election in a completely different world. Now with a war in Europe and looming global recession you could talk about responding to changed circumstances. auspol
Sometimes, just sometimes, decisions need to be taken for the good of MANY vs 4% of the population. How hard is that to understand? Someone on $200K+ DOES NOT NEED the tax cut. But the rest of the people do NEED the benefits of NOT going ahead with these tax cuts! Simple!
typical ALP
And the $275 power price reduction
Conservatives are pushing Labor to renege on the third tier of tax cuts for the rich because they then want to criticise Labor for doing so. They think the community is stupid, but there is a strategy that will make these conservatives, including SMH, look stupid. Figured out?
Australians/ALP, we all know the proposed tax cuts are an oxymoron, and the most corrupt govt in decades LNP, know that too, but they’re writhing in joy waiting for a bullet to fire at ALP, broken promise, broken promise…FS
3.5%
First
I’m a million bucks shy of being a millionaire. I want my tax cut. I want more of the money I earn. Our national anthem proclaims “wealth for toil”… not tax those who do to pay the way of those who don’t. Dismissing this as a cut for the rich is more than a bit rich.
Good! This is worth it.
Most would call it responsible economic management as opposed to economic vandalism if AlboMP went with LNP's high income tax cuts. Trillion dollar debt Budget deficits Cost of living crisis Underfunded services Global uncertainty Inflation & interest rates AustralianLabor
God you guys are sad.
High income earners are only a small portion of the rich. Most of the genuinely wealthy in our society have low absolute taxable incomes. The balance have low incomes relative to their vast wealth. Thoughts about an inheritance tax in Australia?
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »