‘Unlikely’ Voice to Parliament will benefit living conditions for Indigenous people: Sheridan

I thought all the money that’s given to them every year was to help them make a better life for them where is this money going . Maybe someone should do an audit . How long do we have to keep giving all this money they have been getting it for years

Murdoch quoting Murdoch. Sounds legit.🤣🤣🤣

In Greg Sheridan's opinion a voice to parliament may not benefit the living conditions of indigenous people, but, that's just an opinion and there is absolutely no evidence to say it wouldn't be a great benefit either. So stop pushing opinion for fact Sky (Not) News.

A Murdoch journalist against a voice for ALL Australians. What a surprise! 😂😂

Sounds like an expert. He’s obviously experienced this ‘voice to parliament’ thing before…what? He hasn’t! He must be indigenous then…What? He’s not! Why is he even speaking on it then?

Maybe he could donate some cardigans, at least then he’d be useful.

It will achieve absolutely fuck all except make a few trendy city based activists wealthy. All citizens should have the same voice, a vote.

Old white man's opinion.

Sky News, taking the hit from the meth pipe of opinion pieces coughed up as 'news'..

It’s unlikely the voice will do anything It’s just virtue signalling at its finest.

Also everyone: MurdochRoyalCommission MurdochFreeAustralia Murdoch_RC

We have spent far too much money trying to appease the aboriginal population, get them off sit down money and teach them viable trades , don’t give them money make them earn it

Of course not, that's why I don't support it. I want what is best for my Indigenous brothers and sisters ♥️

So an old white guy raised in an Irish Catholic family who has worked much of his life as a political journalist thinks he’s qualified to comment on the possible outcomes of an Indigenous Voice to parliament. Maybe Greg should stick to his wolf warrior defence stories.

Greg Sheridan is he Pells enabler disgraceful human

However, it will do a lot to enrich and empower a small group of people in Canberra.

It baffles me how Sheridan and all others like him make outrageous predictions yet never offer any workable solutions. Just another dag on an lnp arse

Lol at Greg Sheridan who thinks his voice matters

This is fantastic news. Everything Greg says is wrong these days.

So one Murdoch employee quoting another Murdoch employee as if it’s evidence is good reporting is it? FFS can’t you be at least a little bit less disingenuous? A little bit embarrassed perhaps?

Bigoted, boring arse gravy. MurdochGutterMedia

INDIGENOUS DONT DON'T NEED SHERIDAN TELLING THEM. ANYTHING

There are some Pathetic Individuals posing as Journalists within the Mainstream Media cohort.

White man says it won’t benefit the indigenous people. Must be true then.

News Corps Sky News interviews employee of News Corps The Australian. Confirms that they are in still in a long running circle jerk.

Decent Australians say “it’s proven” the absence of indigenous Voice to Parliament “did nothing to benefit” living conditions for Indigenous people.

Shit, well if its Greg saying it then it must be the case. I mean, Greg's never gotten anything wrong before.🙄

Off course not, especially when it's supported by the decent people of parliament. These people never change their spots.

Spoken like the old white entitled male that he is.

Says the middle class white bloke

So I'm just wondering what qualifies a 'foreign editor' to as an expert on the constitution. It is for this very reason we need a Voice. We need indigenous voices having input into policies that affect them- not supposition from 'foreign editors'.

So Greg’s a fortune teller

greg_sheridan It must be a bad day at the office when Chris Kenny is making more sense than you. VoteYes

Mr. Sheridan is the Foreign Editor.

I wonder how much more than an ordinary punter a 'foreign editor' would know. Or is he just parading his prejudices?

Yet he supported religious freedom

Because he's an expert on the topic. Ha ha

Gregs Sheridan is being divisive. 🤷

Greg Sheridan is such a cowards does not even have a independent opinion and like all Murdoch cowards only mirror what the man who breaks into kidnaped and children's emails says.(British Royal inquiry ) SKY mouth pieces are cowards who do not stand up for editorial independence.

It won’t.

Sheridan could do with a shave and a bath and wash his old suit and jumper as well

BIGOTS WILL ALWAYS VOTE NO So little knowledge = So little empathy! So much anger = So much hate! So inconsiderate = So unAustralian VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes

You would think bigots would VoteYes to prove 'The Voice' is divisive, evil & unbeneficial to First Nations as they say! What do they really have to lose? Specifically how is it detrimental to any Australian? Just gutless I guess!

To all First Nations people. Sorry & thank you for being custodians of our land & waters for eons. KNOW THIS Many hear, respect & want the best for you. You may feel some, even your own, do not. It is just they make so much noise. Take heart, you will be supported. VoteYes

We have the privilege of living with the oldest continuous culture on earth but want to ignore what they have to say & disrespect them by treating them as a hindrance!! VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes VoteYes

Specifically how is THE VOICE detrimental to any Australian? The only reason to Vote No is because you are scared of progress & think you are protecting something from the 1950s. Voting No will hold back Australian society! Voting Yes will harm no one except bigots & scammers.

Spending most of my life in smaller towns with large Aboriginal population's I learnt one thing get off your arse and do something for yourself. But it's too easy to sit around and get smashed just keep the $$ flowing

let's just tax Murdoch to the poor house and give it to the Aboriginal community, he's done nothing “will do anything to benefit”to everyday Australians, he can start there

That's a nice argument , but why don't you back it up with a source? SkyNews: 'I made it the fuㄷk up!'

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

'Absurd to think I'd fall into line': Split in Nationals over Indigenous Voice to ParliamentNationals frontbencher Andrew Gee breaks ranks with his colleagues, arguing it is 'absurd' for his party to expect him to change his stance on supporting an Indigenous Voice to Parliament. At least Gee can read his electorate. This race based “voice” thing sure is dividing people and it hasn’t even happened yet. Reject ABC/Labor racism, reject 'the voice'. One people, one nation, one flag.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »

Victorian Nationals leader backs federal counterpart's opposition to the Indigenous Voice to ParliamentVictorian Nationals leader Peter Walsh says his federal leader was 'almost compelled to oppose' the Indigenous Voice to Parliament because of the lack of detail on how it would work. sad to see we need the Indigenous Voice for soul of this country this needlessly creates division and is deeply racist by the nationals Colonial mindset 👍 Shame on him.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »

Indigenous voice to parliament ‘separating Australians based on their race’: HansonOne Nation leader Pauline Hanson says indigenous voice to parliament is “separating Australians based on their race” and that they “don’t have any more rights over it than I do”. “It’s about equality for all Australians regardless of your race, you know, to say that I have no connection to the land is a load of 'bs', I was born here, I love this country, they don’t have any more rights over it than what I do,” Ms Hanson told Sky News host Chris Kenny. “Forget about the fact is they were the first peoples here in this nation, that’s going back 60,000 years ago, deal with today in the now. “It will be rushed through, people will vote emotionally with it, thinking oh yeah why not it’s not gonna have an impact on us. “I don’t trust the governments I don’t trust them at all.” We have no idea what's in it yet. That woman looks white The Human Race
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

The real reason the Nationals are against an Indigenous VoiceThe real, unspoken reason the Nationals have declared opposition to an Indigenous Voice to Parliament is to put more pressure on a weakened Liberal Party to follow suit, writes David Speers. tldr: So the Nats can own the Libs, again they're scared, cause their mates* already a 'third voice in parliament ' *mining billionaires, murduch, big business, and the cafe owners who cry 'nO oNe, wAnT's tO wOrk aNyMore' The ABC just can’t handle it when a black woman thinks for herself.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »

‘Difficult discussions’ within the Nationals ‘expected’: Party split over Indigenous VoiceNationals MP Keith Pitt says the Indigenous Voice to Parliament would divide Australians, not unite them, with the Nationals split over their opposition to the Voice. Nationals frontbencher Andrew Gee and the West Australian state branch have broken ranks and publicly backed the Voice. “The Nationals have difficult discussions as you’d expect,” Mr Pitt told Sky News Australia. “We are one people, one country, and unfortunately, Labor’s Voice is looking to divide us, not unite us.” Yet, it's the right thing to do Agree Nah, it unites all the everyday Australians it will divide us from the racist RWNJ.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

BCA rejects ‘divisive’ Nationals stance on Indigenous VoiceOPINION: MPs backing David Littleproud’s opposition to a First Nations’ Voice in the Constitution are out of step with their communities, says corporate lawyer Danny Gilbert. The BCA sledging the Nats is a brave move. Perhaps they are eager for another surprise violation by labor?
Source: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 Read more »