Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's husband has been nominated to a commission in Washington, D.C., which has the power to remove judges in the district, prompting questions by a former Trump administration attorney about whether any conflicts of interest could arise.
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's husband has been nominated to a commission in Washington , D.C. , which has the power to remove judges in the district, prompting questions by a former Trump administration attorney about whether any conflicts of interest could arise. Jackson's husband, Dr.
Patrick Jackson, has been practicing as a gastrointestinal surgeon at Georgetown University Hospital for the past 20 years and has been the chief of general surgery at the hospital for the past nine years. But just under two years since President Joe Biden nominated his wife to the highest court, he was quietly nominated to the Washington, D.C., Judicial Disabilities and Tenure Commission, or CJDT, a role that would give him "authority" to remove judges in response to complaints
Supreme Court Justice Husband Nominated Commission Washington D.C. Remove Judges Conflicts Of Interest
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Pa. Supreme Court Justice Receives Free Home Repairs Paid for by Brother's Union, Witness SaysA witness testified that Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Kevin Dougherty received free home repairs paid for by his brother's union. The repairs were done in 2011 and included drywall and painting work. Dougherty's lawyer denies the allegations.
Read more »
U.K. Supreme Court Rules Government's Plan to Send Asylum Seekers to Rwanda UnlawfulThe U.K. Supreme Court ruled that the government's plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful due to the risk of ill-treatment. The plan aimed to stop migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats. The U.K. signed a deal with Rwanda to process asylum claims there.
Read more »
UK's plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda ruled unlawful by Supreme CourtThe UK’s controversial plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court Wednesday, dealing a potentially fatal blow to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s flagship migration policy and sparking a furious revolt from the right wing of British politics.
Read more »
UK Supreme Court Rules Against Deportation Plan to RwandaBritain's plan to deport asylum-seekers to Rwanda has been ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court, dealing a blow to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's migration policy and potentially causing a revolt within his Conservative party.
Read more »
Supreme Court to Intervene in Digital Speech ConflictsThe court’s decisions in three major cases this term could fundamentally alter how social media platforms operate.
Read more »
UK Supreme Court Rules Against Government's Asylum Seeker SchemeUK's top court ruled the Rwanda plan, under which Britain intended to send thousands of asylum seekers who arrived on its shores without permission to the East African country in a bid to deter migrants crossing the Channel from Europe, unlawful
Read more »