More than a quarter century ago, voters in California adopted a ban on affirmative action in admissions at public universities. The idea spread, embraced by conservatives who objected to what they called “reverse discrimination.”
The effects are most visible at highly selective public schools, with applicants from underserved minority groups facing greater obstacles to admissions.In California and Michigan, whose public universities draw thousands of applicants a year from around the country, the consequences were both immediate and long-lasting.
In an effort to address that gap, officials in California have spent more than $500 million in outreach to underserved minority students since 2004, lawyers for the state said in a Supreme Court brief this year. Even though a Supreme Court ruling restricting the use of race-conscious admissions is unlikely to affect their states, lawyers for Michigan and California filed briefs with the court over the summer arguing that without affirmative action, achieving racial diversity was virtually impossible.
Maybe they stick to the most qualified applicants?
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: PhillyDailyNews - 🏆 89. / 67 Read more »
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: EatThisNotThat - 🏆 294. / 63 Read more »
Source: DispatchAlerts - 🏆 72. / 68 Read more »
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »