The judge fixed Glynn's trial to begin on Aug 5. No bail was offered to him. His bail of S$5,000 was revoked on Monday, and he has been remanded since.Glynn was first charged on Jul 2 with three charges of failing to wear a mask without reasonable excuse, public nuisance and using threatening words towards a public servant.
During his court mention, the judge reminded him twice to wear his mask properly. When asked if he was pleading guilty or not, he said he did not understand the options.He was pictured in media reports not wearing a mask as he left the court premises with a man who was purportedly his lawyer. His lawyer was not allowed in at first due to improper attire.
Glynn was then brought back to court on Monday and was charged with not wearing a mask after leaving the court on Jul 2. If convicted of failing to wear a mask, Glynn can be jailed for up to six months, fined up to S$10,000, or both. For the offence of public nuisance, he could be jailed for up to three months, fined up to S$2,000, or both.
If guilty of using threatening words towards a public servant in relation to the execution of their duty, he could be jailed for up to a year, fined a maximum of S$5,000, or both.
Just *f* drop him and send him off to high covid places 🤦🏻♂️
Trial? Expect the process to be turned into a public statement about civil liberties & rights. A social circus with a lot of foreign attributes. 🤔😇
If this happened in Philippines, the human rights group including some senators will bring Duterte to ICC...😂😂😂✌🏻
Maximum sentence please
Is there a public transcript from his first hearing
as he should
Singapore Latest News, Singapore Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TODAYonline - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »
Source: TODAYonline - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Source: TODAYonline - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »