"For Oogachaga and, to the best of our knowledge, others in the local LGBTQ community, there are no immediate plans to mount legal challenges to redefine marriage as it presently stands in the Women's Charter," executive director Leow Yangfa added.
Mr Shanmugam was giving an update on the Government's efforts to seek views on the law, a week after afamilies, marriages and children in relation to a possible repeal of Section 377A.community will instead prioritise providing support for fellow LGBTQ Singaporeans.
As Sunzi says, before the enemy opens the door, you act demure like a young virgin. But once the door is opened...
When Singapore is NOT ready a PM of “other” races, should we be even talking about 377A repeal?
If lifestyle orgs. want the word “marriage”, they can have it. However, GLBT citizens must be entitled to: (1) anti-discrimination protections; and (2) civil unions with the same policy benefits as “marriage” Here’s to a fair Singapore, with common space for ALL citizens.
Unlikely? Red herring for your breakfast
Don't repeal I don't want to see gay couples in ROM
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Singapore Latest News, Singapore Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Section 377A review: Govt considering how to safeguard 'current legal position on marriage', says ShanmugamSINGAPORE — The Government is considering how to safeguard 'the current legal position on marriage' from being challenged in the courts, after receiving feedback that most people want the current position on marriage to stay, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmuga Asking religious leaders for their views? Singapore is like Iran? Thank you sir! Let’s hold on to our values!
Source: TODAYonline - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Views on 377A: Government looking at how to safeguard current legal position on marriage, says ShanmugamSINGAPORE: The Singapore Government is looking at how it can safeguard the current legal position on marriage against challenges in the courts, while it considers the next steps for Section 377A of the Penal Code, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam on Saturday (Jul 30). Mr Shanmugam was respond What is the reason to have a law which as you say I will be not used? And why criminalize gay sex when not criminalizing lesbian sex? The first cut is the deepest. Please keep the status quo. No need to meddle when nothing is not broken. Don't keikiang. LGBT should leave Singapore
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »
We should avoid taking extreme positions on Section 377A and work out differences calmly: ShanmugamSINGAPORE - The Government is considering how best to balance ground feedback that gay sex should not be criminalised with the desire for Singapore's current position on marriage to be retained. Speaking to reporters on Saturday (July 30), Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said the Government has had extensive discussions with different people on Section 377A of the...
Source: asiaonecom - 🏆 10. / 59 Read more »
If 377A is repealed, Catholic Church's concern is for marriage to remain between man and womanSINGAPORE: The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Singapore said on Sunday (Jul 31) that should Section 377A - a law that criminalises gay sex - be repealed, its concern is for marriage to remain between a man and a woman. The Archdiocese's statement was released on its website in response to media queries on r it can remain between a man and woman for catholics~ the rest of the country is not catholic, so don't try to dictate what the rest of us can or cannot do. imagine if Muslims wanted all of us to abstain from pork Enough of all these. We are a secular state, not a Catholic state. With all due respect, gays are not gay by choice and should not be discriminated on the policy front for the sole reason that they are unable to get legally married.
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »
Singapore Catholic Church says marriage is between man and woman but it respects dignity of LGBTQ peopleIf they are true to their word, then they must irrevocably agree that: (1) the legitimate human rights of GLBTs as citizens must also be safeguarded. (2) GLBTs must be entitled to civil unions with the same policy benefits as “marriage”, and anti-discrimination protections. What about those of us who are NOT Catholics? We're free to want that marriage LEGALLY (not by religion!) be allowed between any 2 consenting adults, right? Marriage is a legal contract between two persons. I do not think Christians have anything to say about it.
Source: straits_times - 🏆 5. / 69 Read more »