Massachusetts, Privacy, Facebook

Massachusetts, Privacy

Facebook may have to disclose some app records in privacy probe, Massachusetts court rules

Facebook may have to disclose some app records in privacy probe, Massachusetts court rules

24/3/2021 7:33:00 PM

Facebook may have to disclose some app records in privacy probe, Massachusetts court rules

BOSTON: Massachusetts ' top court on Wednesday reversed an order requiring Facebook Inc to turn over to state Attorney General Maura Healey ...

25 Mar 2021 12:10AMShare this contentBookmarkBOSTON: Massachusetts' top court on Wednesday reversed an order requiring Facebook Inc to turn over to state Attorney General Maura Healey records identifying apps the company suspected had misused customer data, but the justices said she ultimately could obtain some materials.

Victoria JC student infected with Covid-19; 103 people quarantined, 2,200 others to be swabbed 7 community cases among 20 new COVID-19 infections in Singapore Victoria Junior College student positive for COVID-19; more than 100 students, staff members quarantined

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that while some of Facebook's records were protected from disclosure, Healey had demonstrated a"substantial need" for materials to investigate the social media company's privacy practices following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

AdvertisementAdvertisementHealey and Facebook did not respond to requests for comment.The records stemmed from an internal investigation Facebook launched in 2018 after revelations that Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm, had improperly gained access to data from as many as 87 million of the social media network's users. headtopics.com

Cambridge Analytica provided the data to help Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election campaign.According to court papers, Facebook's internal investigation led it to suspend 69,000 apps, mostly because their developers did not cooperate with the investigation. About 10,000 were identified as having potentially misused user info.

AdvertisementAdvertisementThe internal investigation was led by a law firm, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, in anticipation of litigation, Facebook said.Healey, a Democrat, went to court in 2019 to enforce the civil equivalent of a subpoena after Facebook refused to disclose the identities of such apps.

Justice Scott Kafker, writing for the 5-0 court, said a lower-court judge wrongly concluded Facebook's information did not qualify as attorney"work product" potentially protected from disclosure.But Kafker said further lower-court proceedings would likely determine that a"significant amount of information" could be disclosed.

AdvertisementOther states are conducting similar probes. The attorney general for Washington, D.C., sued Facebook in 2018 over the scandal. In 2019, Facebook agreed to pay US$5 billion to resolve a Federal Trade Commission probe into its privacy practices. headtopics.com

Singapore to extend stay-home notice to 21 days for travellers from higher-risk places Many governments helping their country’s media; SPH case no different: Shanmugam 'Additional discovery' reviewed as Amos Yee remanded by US court on child porn charges

(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Will Dunham and Jonathan Oatis) Read more: CNA »

A Chinese ‘auntie’ went on a solo road trip. Now, she’s a feminist icon