These dangerous statements constituting asshould be useful to those who will go to the Supreme Court to question the constitutionality of the law.
However, in future posts, please be aware that the prosecution cannot be stopped from using one’s old tweets or posts to establish motive or the continuity of the thought adjudged to be criminal or as proof of premeditation. The simple point is that one should always be mindful that whatever public statements one makes should be defensible in court. Legitimate, truthful, and fair criticism of government actions are easily defensible, but publicly calling for the assassination of the President even in the context of a joke would be inviting a disaster. In other words, this is not the time to be stupid or reckless.Disini vs.
A very good piece on the blurred line between responsible digital citizenship and self-censorship in social media.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Philippines Latest News, Philippines Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
As anti-terror law challenge mounts, Palace says laws passed by Congress presumed constitutional
Source: ABSCBNNews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Roque defends Anti-Terror Law, says safeguards 'enough' to protect rightsPresidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said while the law had enough safeguards to prevent abuse, individuals can also avail of legal remedies such as writs if they believe they are unduly affected by the Anti-Terror Law. of course he would say that he's the presidential spokesperson O Rappler mayroon daw legal remedies at siyempre meron din na legal quagmire...kaya careful, careful Ooops, nope. The practice is, the stringent law shall prevail, kaya hindi maganda na matatamaan ang bill of rights.
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »
Legal experts, opposition congressmen want Supreme Court to block enforcement of anti-terror lawThe senate clearly does not care about the dissenting majority voices .. they don't care about the public whom they are supposed to serve.. they serve only themselves.. shame... 😠 Ang ATL ba sagot sa...kahirapan at paglilimos ng milyon na Pilipino, palpak na Covid19 response 41k positive, ayudang hindi dumadating, libong stranded na pasahero, 4million walang trabaho, libo libong nagsasarang negosyo, pagpatay sa Army4, Disasters? Kamalasan ng admin na eto.
Source: ABSCBNNews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Groups file Supreme Court petitions vs anti-terror law | Evening wRapWatch Rappler’s evening newscast with Michelle Abad
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »
More petitions to come: Supreme Court battle vs anti-terror law startsThe Supreme Court battle against the anti-terror law officially begins. By Rappler's count, there are at least 8 groups that will be filing petitions; some of them have opted to wait until the law takes effect 15 days after publication.
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »
13 provisions of anti-terror law unconstitutional — FEU law profsMANILA, Philippines — Law professors from the Far Eastern University led by Dean Mel Sta. Maria has questioned before the Supreme Court the constitutionality of 13 provisions of Republic Act
Source: inquirerdotnet - 🏆 3. / 86 Read more »