Criticism over the pair's decision to keep baby Archie out of the spotlight has been mounting for months. And recent revelations -- that British taxpayers footed a £2.4 million bill for home renovation, and plans to keep his christening private -- have done little to silence critics.
"Meghan can't demand privacy for baby Archie while asking the public to fund her family's lifestyle," complained the Daily Telegraph. The Sunday Times quoted royal biographer Penny Junor as saying:"They can't have it both ways. Either they are totally private, pay for their own house and disappear out of view, or play the game the way it is played."
Pollard said he saw no problem with critics questioning how public money was being spent, and expressed concern that Harry and Meghan were"trying to have their cake and eat it." This type of critique infuriates the #SussexSquad -- a vociferous army of online supporters, particularly of Meghan. On stories like the christening, those devoted to the duchess enlist the help of an unlikely defender: a US law professor.
He continued:"She put out the book and she's made all of this money for charity and she's brought all of this attention. And yet there are all of these critiques on these niggling things that shouldn't matter very much.""So, women of color are uncouth, women of color are undeserving, women of color are angry, etc.
Philippines Latest News, Philippines Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ANCALERTS - 🏆 26. / 50 Read more »
Source: inquirerdotnet - 🏆 3. / 86 Read more »
Source: manilabulletin - 🏆 25. / 51 Read more »
Source: ANCALERTS - 🏆 26. / 50 Read more »
Source: inquirerdotnet - 🏆 3. / 86 Read more »