Court stops FG from funding police trust fund from federation account
The court holds that institutions or bodies, such as the NPTF not listed in the Nigerian constitution cannot be funded directly from the ...
3 min readSections 4(1)(a) and 4(1)(b) of the law permits the deduction of 0.5 per cent of the total revenue accruing to the Federation Accounr to be paid to the NPTF to boost the funding of the Nigerian Police Force.Governor Nyesom WikeIt contended that it was not the responsibility of the state governments, but that of the federal government to fund the police.
Delivering judgement in the suit, Ahmed Mohammed, the judge, declared as “illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional,” the direct allocations made so far by the federal government from the federation account to fund the NPTF.The court also held that section 4 of the Nigeria Police Trust Fund Act 2019 relied upon by the federal government to justify the unlawful deductions from the federation account is inconsistent with section 162 of the 1999 Constitution which recognises only the federal, states and local governments.Read more: Premium Times »
Buhari signs three bills to tackle money laundering, terrorism financing
The president described the bills as being in tandem with this administration’s commitment to fighting corruption and illicit financing activities, as well as critical to the governance agenda and the development of Nigeria. Read more >>
Over Four Million MSMES Have Benefited From N150b FG Schemes – OsinbajoVice President Yemi Osinbajo (SAN) has said that beyond providing interest-free microcredit loans to petty traders, the various social intervention schemes of the Buhari administration have made a significant impact in the lives of millions of ordinary Nigerians. Na wa Na only statistics dis one sabi😏😏😏 Yeeepa😡😡😡😡😡!!!!!
FG backtracks, retains petrol subsidyThe federal government said it was going back to the National Assembly to seek for the amendment of the 2022 budget to cover petrol subsidy payment beyond June this year when it should end. Election in sight. It's a wise decision taking by federal government. because removing subsidy will not boost the country economy but causes more hardship to the nation at large. Nice one.
NLC reacts as FG suspends fuel subsidy removalThe Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC, has demanded that the federal government should re-engage the organised labour in discussions in order to find mutually Always Reacting
Don’t short-change members, COEASU tells FG - Punch NewspapersThe most widely read newspaper in Nigeria THE ILLEGAL 1999 CONSTITUTION 1-it was never rectified by the people 2-it became even more ILLEGAL when the 12 northern state seceded from Nigeria with their sharia The Nigeria constitution made us all stateless,it's an ILLEGAL document no amendement😡 *Coastline Ng* is currently recruiting head of operations in a production firm. Location: Ogba, Lagos. Interested candidates should submit their CV to jobs.coastlinenggmail.com
FG Suspended Fuel Subsidy Removal Because Of 2023 Elections, Says Akpata President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Olumide Akpata, says the decision to postpone the removal of fuel subsidy is not far from the forthcoming general elections. He stated this on Monday during his appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today, hours after the government said it would postpone the removal of fuel subsidy … Continue reading FG Suspended Fuel Subsidy Removal Because Of 2023 Elections, Says Akpata OperationRescueNigeria 🇳🇬 PDPfor2023 And so what..... Sometimes I just laugh at Nigerians. You want something and you got it, why not commend them. Government can’t subsidize everything. Once we have an active refinery the issue of petroleum subsidy will be an history.
BREAKING: Fuel subsidy will last another 18 months - FGThe federal government has disclosed that the subsidy of fuel will last for another 18months, pending when an amendment in the Petroleum Industry Act will Fit our refinery Befor removal of subsidy Sure? Nawa ooo,what the hell is this country turning too ooo
The court holds that institutions or bodies, such as the Nigeria Police Trust Fund not listed in the Nigerian constitution cannot be funded directly from the Federation Account. by January 26, 2022 3 min read The Federal High court in Abuja, on Wednesday, barred the federal government from further making deductions from the federation account to fund the Nigeria Police Trust Fund (NPTF) or other institutions not listed in the Nigerian constitution. The PTF is not a creation of the Nigerian constitution, but that of the National Assembly through the enactment of the Nigeria Police Trust Fund (Establishment) Act which came into force in 2019. Sections 4(1)(a) and 4(1)(b) of the law permits the deduction of 0.5 per cent of the total revenue accruing to the Federation Accounr to be paid to the NPTF to boost the funding of the Nigerian Police Force. The Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) had announced at its April 2020 meeting that the deductions were to commence in earnest. But about a month after the FAAC meeting, Governor Nyesom Wike -led Rivers State Government filed its suit on May 20, 2020 to challenge the planned deductions and the law on which it was premised. The Rivers State Government, through its Attorney-General of the Federation, challenged what it described as the unlawful deductions being made from the federation account, jointly owned by the federal, state and local governments, to fund the NPTF. It contended that it was not the responsibility of the state governments, but that of the federal government to fund the police. It urged the court to order a refund of the money deducted from the Federation Account and paid into the NPTF since when it was informed about it at the FAAC meeting of April 2020. Judgement Delivering judgement in the suit, Ahmed Mohammed, the judge, declared as “illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional,” the direct allocations made so far by the federal government from the federation account to fund the NPTF. Mr Mohammed held that Section 161 and Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution were breached by the federal government in making direct allocations to the NPTF from the Federation Account. He added that Section 162 of the 1999 is unambiguous to the effect that only the federal, states and local governments shall be allocated fund directly from the Federation Account. The court also held that section 4 of the Nigeria Police Trust Fund Act 2019 relied upon by the federal government to justify the unlawful deductions from the federation account is inconsistent with section 162 of the 1999 Constitution which recognises only the federal, states and local governments. It also agreed with the plaintiff that the levies imposed on companies operating in Nigeria by the federal government to be paid directly to the NPTF instead of the Federation Account was also illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional. The Rivers State government had argued that such levies ought to be paid to the federation account for it to be benefit from it. It said failure to pay such funds into the federation account and rather into the NPTF has deprived it of substantial revenue accruable to the state as taxes. Refund While upholding that the plaintiff’s suit, the judge ordered that the funds belonging to Rivers State but were used to fund the NPTF by the federal government should be refunded to the state. The judge, however, declined to extend similar order of refund to the 35 remaining states on the grounds that they were not parties in the suit and that the Rivers State as the plaintiff in this matter did not file it on behalf of others. The court upheld all arguments of Joseph Daudu, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), who stood for Rivers State that where the provisions of the 1999 Constitution are clear and unambiguous, they must be given their ordinary meanings. The court also agreed with Mr Daudu that the federal government was completely wrong in the interpretation given to section 4 of the Nigeria Police Trust Fund Act to the effect that the Nigerian Police was established for the federal government alone and as such the funding is solely on the shoulder of the federal government. Suit Rivers State in a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/511/2020 and instituted on its behalf by Mr Daudu, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), challenged the decision of the federal government allocating funds directly from the Federation Account to fund some of its agencies claiming that the decision violated section 162 of the 1999 Constitution. The Rivers State government also claimed that by the federal government’s unlawful action, it had deprived it substantial revenue from the federation account, and therefore prayed the court to nullify the unlawful funds allocation from the federation account. Defendants in the matter are the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice AGF, Accountant General of the Federation, Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission and Minister of Finance. AGF’s defence dismissed Only the Attorney General of the Federation filled processes to defend the federal government’s action. Advertisements The AGF had in his preliminary objection asked the Federal High Court to decline jurisdiction in the matter on the ground that such suit ought to be filed directly at the Supreme Court. But the judge dismissed the preliminary objection before going ahead to deliver the verdict. The court held that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court can only be invoked when a dispute involves the federation and any of the component states. On the objection raised by the AGF that the Rivers State government ought to have sought and obtained the leave of the Federal High Court before instituting the suit, the judge said the plaintiff had no reason to seek the court’s permission to file the case.