The court has heard the outcome of the three cases could have a bearing on thousands of other borrowers who had tracker mortgages with the bank.
Referencing case law that dealt with previous ombudsman decisions, Ms Barrington said judges often referred to findings that were “reasonably open” to the ombudsman, who was “entitled” to reach a conclusion that a judge disagrees with. She said the ombudsman’s decision-making process was not as formal as the court process.
Mr McCullough has focused on one of the three cases. He said the ombudsman did not say in its case decision last year how Ulster Bank breached the Consumer Protection Code 2006 by not allowing the borrowers to return to a tracker rate. The borrowers signed a so-called flexible mortgage transfer form in early 2006, entitling them to move on to a tracker loan. As ECB rates were rising, in May 2007, they subsequently applied to fix their interest rates until August 2010.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: IrishTimesBiz - 🏆 6. / 77 Read more »
Source: IrishTimesBiz - 🏆 6. / 77 Read more »
Source: IrishTimes - 🏆 3. / 98 Read more »
Source: businessposthq - 🏆 8. / 71 Read more »