Associations representing the construction industry and petroleum producers lined up in support of a Supreme Court of Canada ruling that deems parts of the controversial federal Impact Assessment Act , which came into law four years ago, are unconstitutional.
“We are thrilled with this decision and what it means for Canadian workers, their families, and everyone who stands to benefit from Canada’s responsibly produced natural resources during a global energy crisis,” said Mike Martens, president of ICBA Alberta. “The ill-advised and heavy-handeddamaged Canada’s economy, prosperity, and the families that depended on it, driving away investment and creating uncertainty. It has been tossed in the trash can, where it belongs.
The association noted the IAA replaced the National Energy Board with the bureaucratic Canada Energy Regulator and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency with the IAA, and the changes resulted in institutionalized jurisdictional duplication, uncertainty on time limits and expanded discretionary practices, ultimately causing vague and uncertain timelines for projects.
“The speedy review process promised by Ottawa was an illusion. And today, it has been rightly struck down by the courts.” While the association is in full support of environmental protections, it has long complained the IAA is anti-resource development, said a statement by the PCA. In the spirit of the court’s call for co-operation, Baiton said CAPP looks forward to collaborating with the federal and provincial governments to ensure projects in the national interest, such as those reinforcing energy security, providing lower emissions energy, and maintaining affordability to Canadians, will proceed in a timely manner.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Source: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 Read more »
Source: CBCTheNational - 🏆 69. / 51 Read more »
Source: tbnewswatch - 🏆 75. / 51 Read more »
Source: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 Read more »