Environment groups say they feel muzzled from speaking out about the urgency of climate change after the federal elections agency warned earlier this summer that doing so could be considered partisan.
If the advertising exceeds $500, third parties would have to register with Elections Canada, raising fears among some environmental charities that the Canada Revenue Agency could also decide they are partisan and put their tax status in jeopardy.
Source: Energy Industry News (energyindustrynews.net)
What stupidity. Free Speech! Let anyone say anything they want on the issue
Good At the very least it should eliminate the most partisan groups and keep the fear mongering to a minimum
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Elections Canada warns environment groups that calling climate change real could be considered partisanThe warning comes after Maxime Bernier, the leader of the People’s Party of Canada, has expressed doubts about the legitimacy of climate change No no no no no. It's NOT partisan. It's SCIENCE. It's a FACT. What the actual fuck? Climate change is SETTLED SCIENCE. ¿Qué?
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Elections Canada to assess ‘partisan’ climate change rhetoric case by caseEnvironment groups say they feel muzzled from speaking out about the urgency of climate change after the federal elections agency warned earlier this summer that doing so could be considered partisan globepolitics Should eliminate the most partisan groups and keep the fear mongering to a minimum at least. globepolitics Climate Change is the most important issue facing the planet right now. Elections Canada cannot muzzle people who are concerned about this issue. globepolitics So if we are going by factual data and science the only view that should be suspect is those making claims against the validity of overwhelming scientific evidence, but I think even they have a right to espouse their nonsense.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »